| 查看: 262 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
redwang8181至尊木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
【求助】翻译一篇
|
||
|
I was disappointed by the AGM. I think the target should have been: 1) say a few encouraging words about EEStor progress that is tangible yet respects the NDA 2) say a few encouraging words about success marketing Zennergy to the automotive market I think the market opportunity discussion was not as important as expanding on the facts surrounding marketing it to potential automotive customers. Innocuous facts like, number of meetings, number of repeat meetings, etc seems like it would have been helpful. Interested parties aren't asking for highly secret information---anecdotes of a generic nature would be very helpful but not harmful. Concerning the alleged harassment case: it does not appear that the correct facts of the case were actually brought to light in regards to the human rights commission. Keep in mind Zenn that the best way to put something behind you is to not create new opportunities for additional questions. In my unhumble opinion, the single biggest challenge for Zenn at this point in time is to prove that the burn rate is actually accomplishing something tangible and concrete when placed against the backdrop of the fact that no one knows when EEStor might announce something. Also, there seems to be no sense of if the wait for EEStor might be 30 or 90 or 240 days. So, to prove the burn rate makes sense, someone needs to elaborate on the "outsourcing" that is currently occurring. That is a very mysterious destination for investor funding at the present time and I'm sure if a bit of information could come out about it, it would be well received. Finally, I think the missed opportunity to provide an encouraging message at the AGM is a direct function of the distraction caused by mishandling the harassment case. This needs to be placed in the rearview mirror as a much accelerated pace. Had the AGM gone over better with me, maybe it would have convinced me it is NOT a distraction |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有5人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有29人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有5人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有12人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
高职单位投计算机相关的北核或SCI四区期刊推荐，求支招！
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
读博
已经有4人回复
-
JMPT 期刊投稿流程
已经有4人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
sammi_deng
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 11
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 915.9
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 360
- 在线: 53.5小时
- 虫号: 946500
- 注册: 2010-01-21
- 专业: 配位化学
|
I was disappointed by the AGM. I think the target should have been: 1) say a few encouraging words about EEStor progress that is tangible yet respects the NDA 2) say a few encouraging words about success marketing Zennergy to the automotive market 我对AGM很失望。我觉得这个目标应该是: 1)说一些关于EEStor进展,能够很好的代表NDA的鼓励的话。 2)说一些成功营销Zennergy对汽车市场鼓励的话。 |
2楼2010-04-01 14:08:54