| 查看: 1611 | 回复: 33 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
又个七年木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
文章有了结果，一个是小修，一个直接据，我该怎么办
|
||
|
各位虫友大侠： 本人两个月前投了一篇文章到Journal of Materials Science，今天来了消息：貌似一个审稿人几乎已经接受了，第二个审稿人直接给据了，不知道这样的情况可不可以写信给编辑申请给第三个审稿人。郁闷的不得了阿，被materials letters 悲剧，改投这里又是悲剧~~咋办呢~~5555 Dear Dr. Li, I have now received comments from the referees regarding your manuscript. One referee's remarks are simplistic and cursory, and the second does not recommend publication. I have also carefully studied the manuscript, and other publications in this field. Given that the second referee is a world leading expert in this field, I have decided to reject the manuscript at this stage. I'm sorry I could not provide a more positive response. Yours Sincerely, Editor, Journal of Materials Science ==== Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled "Fabrication of flower-like MoS2 microsphere using MoO3 nanobelts as precursors" by Li et al. describes a low temperature hydrothermal synthetic route to obtain MoS2 microsphere with a flower-like morphology. Interest in synthesizing high surface area MoS2 like nanoflowers, nanotubes and other similar forms is currently the area of interest for various applications like catalysis, field-emission and hydrogen storage. It is in this aspect that the present manuscript generates great interest in reporting the synthesis of high surface area flower-like MoS2. The as-synthesized flowers have been well characterized and adequate electron microscopy has been carried out. However the following points need to be addressed before the article is suitable to be published in J. Mater. Sci. (1) The following ref: F. L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M. J. Yacaman, Appl. Phys. A. 96 (2009) 861 on the transformation of MoO3 nanobelts into MoS2 nanotubes and F. L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M. J. Yacaman, Mat. Chem. Phys. 118 (2009) 392-397 which reports the synthesis of MoS2 nanoflowers should be included in the list of references since they are two recent papers in this field. (2) Page-5, Correct the Fig.1, caption, Fig 1d- TEM image (3) Line 45-46, page 5, No ref is included in the list for Tenne et al. Please include a couple of refs which are suitable to the discussion. (4) Page-6, line 30, should be "quantity" not "quality." (5) Page-6, line 44-45, should be Fig 3d and not Fig. 4d. (6) The scale in Fig. 3d is not clear. Reviewer #2: In general terms this work is interesting, I would see merit to its publication if a systematic series of control experiments were conducted to fully demonstrate the formation mechanism. As it stands now, the microstructural characterization does not fully corroborate the conclusions, with regards to identification of the vesicle, and why it exists. Furthermore, better HRTEM (and EELS) is required to confirm the statements made from figure 3d (and 4a). Finally, I really find the use of jargon (flowers and belts) to be very poor descriptors. I would encourage the authors to continue their work, but at present more solid data is required before this manuscript should be published. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有13人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有6人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有5人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有29人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
高职单位投计算机相关的北核或SCI四区期刊推荐，求支招！
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
读博
已经有4人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
glassman782
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1519 (讲师)
- 金币: 13340.3
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7313
- 在线: 513.9小时
- 虫号: 468843
- 注册: 2007-11-28
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
21楼2010-03-30 06:55:41