24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

leongoall

专家顾问 (知名作家)

P-M-I之初生牛犊

应助: 144 (高中生)
贵宾: 0.055
金币: 7602.7
散金: 627
红花: 35
沙发: 3
帖子: 5347
在线: 1063小时
虫号: 490263
注册: 2008-01-03
性别: GG
专业: 等离子体物理
管辖: 物理

[交流] 编辑让我修改后重新投本杂志，我该如何回信？

去年年底投了一篇文章到IoP里面的PSST，今天编辑终于把两个审稿人的意见以及编辑意见发过来，内容如下：

Dear Professor **，

TITLE:******
AUTHORS: ******

Your paper submitted to Plasma Sources Science and Technology has now been refereed and the referee report(s) are below.

I am sorry to tell you that your paper is not suitable for publication in Plasma Sources Science and Technology in its current form. The changes needed are too great for a revision. However, the referee(s) feel that if you rewrite the article as explained in the referee reports, and include any further work recommended, it may then be suitable for reconsideration. If you wish to rewrite your paper, please take the referee comments fully into account, and provide a detailed response and a full list of changes. We will treat the rewritten paper as a new submission, with a new article reference number, and it will be peer reviewed again. Please note that although we will go back to the previous referees for their second opinion where this is possible, we may also contact further referees in order to ensure that the rewritten paper meets our high quality and interest criteria. If it does not do this, the new version will be rejected.

I would like to thank you for your interest in Plasma Sources Science and Tchnology.

Yours sincerely

Christopher Mooney
Publishing Administrator
on behalf of
Mark J Kushner
Editor-in-Chief

下面就是两个审稿人意见Referee 1： This is an interesting preliminary report on ***
具体问题。

Referee 2： The technique seems to be useful on the ***. This work was good try to ***. However, there are some critical ambiguities in their logic.

具体问题
总体概括两个审稿人的意见，提出的问题都比较苛刻，需要补充很多工作，但个人和导师都觉得这些工作还是可以补充的。现在的问题是，要补充审稿人提出的问题还是需要不少时间的，我目前该怎么处理编辑的这封信？该不该回复？如何回复？
谢谢！！

回复此楼