| 查看: 283 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[交流]
请问这样的审稿意见怎么回答比较好呢？
|
||
|
Reviewer #2: The obtained results were interesting. But some details need to be clarified: …… For IR and XPS analysis, all the peak separation process need very important precaution to have significant evolution. The obtained variation dues to peak separation given by authors is too small to have a clair physical-chemistry confirmation. 我的这个实验本身变量就不大，所以XPS分析出来的数据虽然有差别也比较符合实验结果，但是被审稿人认为差别太小。而且，XPS分峰数据本身的确带有一定的主观性。请前辈们帮忙看看应该怎么回答比较合适，谢谢。 |
回复此楼
2楼2010-03-04 08:53:22