| ²é¿´: 306 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
26545479½ð³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
JAPͶ¸åÇóÖú
|
||
|
ͶÁËÆªJAPµÄÎÄÕ£¬Éó¸åÈËÌáÁËËĵãÒâ¼û£¬Éó¸åÈ˵ÚÒ»¸öÒâ¼ûÎÒÔÚÎÄÖÐ×÷ÁËÐ޸쬯äËüÈý¸öÔÚresponse letter ÖÐ×÷Á˽âÊÍ£¬Ã»ÓÐÐÞ¸ÄÎÄÕÂÄÚÈÝ£¬ÒòΪÕâÈýµãÖ»ÊÇÉó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄÒÉÎÊ£¬²¢Ã»ÓÐÒªÇóÐÞ¸Äʲô£¬¿ÉÊDZà¼Ð´ÐÅÀ´ËµÎÒûÓа´ÕÕÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÔÚÎÄÖÐÒ»Ò»Ð޸ģ¬The reviewer had recommended minor revisions. However, in your response letter you indicated that only response to the first point he/she raised you changed the text. Actually, you clarified for the benefit of the reviewer (but not of the journal's reader) the other three points; yet, as he/she suggested "any insight they may like to offer would be useful to the interested scientific community". ÕâÖÖÇé¿ö²»Öª´ó¼ÒÓöµ½¹ýû£¬¸ÃÔõô°ì£¿Ð»Ð»£¡ [ Last edited by 26545479 on 2010-2-23 at 11:11 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
micronwang
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4713.8
- Ìû×Ó: 625
- ÔÚÏß: 384.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 336510
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-01
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ÄãÒѾ»Ø´ðºÃÁËÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÌáÎÊ£¬µ«Éó¸åÈË»¹ÒªÄã¼ÓµãÌÖÂÛ»òÊÇÕ¹Íû£¬ÄãûÓÐ×ö£¬Ôټӵ㶫Î÷£¬Î޷ǾÍÊÇÕ¹Íû£¬ÆÀ¼ÛÒÔ¼°¶Ô±¾ÁìÓòµÄÓ°ÏìµÈµÈ¡£ |
2Â¥2010-02-23 12:08:43
Ñà¹Âºè
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1561.4
- Ìû×Ó: 2127
- ÔÚÏß: 183.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 843099
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-08
- רҵ: Éùѧ

3Â¥2010-02-23 12:53:58













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥