24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 211.1
散金: 38
帖子: 361
在线: 285.7小时
虫号: 491635
注册: 2008-01-07
专业: 管理心理与行为

[交流] IEEE T fuzzy systems的审稿结果已有4人参与

投稿IEEE T fuzzy systems3个月，审稿结果如下，主编给了大修，AE也给乐肯定的意见，但是三个审稿人中，有2个的意见很不错，但有一个直接拒绝了文章，主要理由是应用太简单。有经验的帮忙分析下修改后有没有希望，这里多谢了
Based on the referee reports and the Associate Editor's recommendation, I am sorry to inform that you your paper cannot be accepted in its current form. The manuscript needs a major revision based on the comments of the referees and associate editor and a re-review before it can be further processed.

Associate Editor Comments for Authors are given below:

Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
The idea is very interesting, but all the reviewers agree that the application is too simple.

The referee comments are given below. If the referees have attached a review file, you will need to retrieve it from your 'Author Center' at the Transactions on Fuzzy Systems Manuscript Central website http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tfs-ieee . When you resubmit, be sure to follow the instructions for submitting a revised paper.

Except in unusual cases, the size of the revised manuscript (excluding Authors Response) should be restricted to 35 pages (for full papers), 18 pages (for short papers) and 8 pages (for letters) typed double spaced in single column mode with 1 inch margin on all sides, 12 point font, including figures, appendices, etc..

In order to make a paper effective and the journal respected, proper English usage is critical. Manuscripts with improper English usage may be rejected.

Thank you for your interest in the Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

Sincerely,

Nikhil R. Pal, Editor-in-Chief
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

*************** Reviews ***************

Referee: 1
Comments to the Author
The proposal presented in this paper is quite interesting. The new application is quite interesting and promising though several justifications should be included in order to clarify some decsions made in the paper. As well some sections should be shortened or splitted to improve the understanding of the objectives. Eventually I miss some other cites in the paper.

First I think the introduction is to long and it should be shortened and focus in the current problem and the objectives chases by this paper. Most of content is related work if the authors consider relevant all this content they should include a related works section.

Referee: 2 （直接拒稿）
Comments to the Author
See the attached.

Referee: 3
Comments to the Author
The paper has shown a good application. The topic is very interesting and contribute the application with some distinctive features, e.g. The paper was also well presented and organized. I suggest the paper can be accepted provided that the following comments can be addressed accordingly.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

1楼2010-02-16 18:34:26

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 211.1
散金: 38
帖子: 361
在线: 285.7小时
虫号: 491635
注册: 2008-01-07
专业: 管理心理与行为

引用回帖:

Originally posted by zhzimi_2007 at 2010-04-10 06:55:17:

楼主，你好：请教一个问题，最近投稿到IEEE T fuzzy systems，一开始状态是Awaiting Adiminator Processing, 半个月后状态变成Under review.请问under review 这个状态是不是意味着专家外审呢？

对，是这样的

回复此楼