24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3020  |  回复: 14
当前主题已经存档。

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

[交流] IEEE T fuzzy systems的审稿结果已有4人参与

投稿IEEE T fuzzy systems3个月,审稿结果如下,主编给了大修,AE也给乐肯定的意见,但是三个审稿人中,有2个的意见很不错,但有一个直接拒绝了文章,主要理由是应用太简单。有经验的帮忙分析下修改后有没有希望,这里多谢了
Based on the referee reports and the Associate Editor's recommendation, I am sorry to inform that you your paper cannot be accepted in its current form. The manuscript needs a major revision based on the comments of the referees and associate editor and a re-review before it can be further processed.

Associate Editor Comments for Authors are given below:

Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
The idea is very interesting, but all the reviewers agree that the application is too simple.

The referee comments are given below. If the referees have attached a review file, you will need to retrieve it from your 'Author Center' at the Transactions on Fuzzy Systems Manuscript Central website http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tfs-ieee . When you resubmit, be sure to follow the instructions for submitting a revised paper.

Except in unusual cases, the size of the revised manuscript (excluding Authors Response) should be restricted to 35 pages (for full papers), 18 pages (for short papers) and 8 pages (for letters) typed double spaced in single column mode with 1 inch margin on all sides, 12 point font, including figures, appendices, etc..

In order to make a paper effective and the journal respected, proper English usage is critical. Manuscripts with improper English usage may be rejected.

Thank you for your interest in the Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

Sincerely,

Nikhil R. Pal, Editor-in-Chief
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

*************** Reviews ***************

Referee: 1
Comments to the Author
The proposal presented in this paper is quite interesting. The new application is quite interesting and promising though several justifications should be included in order to clarify some decsions made in the paper. As well some sections should be shortened or splitted to improve the understanding of the objectives. Eventually I miss some other cites in the paper.

First I think the introduction is to long and it should be shortened and focus in the current problem and the objectives chases by this paper. Most of content is related work if the authors consider relevant all this content they should include a related works section.


Referee: 2 (直接拒稿)
Comments to the Author
See the attached.

Referee: 3
Comments to the Author
The paper has shown a good application. The topic is very interesting and contribute the application with some distinctive features, e.g. The paper was also well presented and organized. I suggest the paper can be accepted provided that the following comments can be addressed accordingly.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

bluebluerain

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
工科也认Science么
都是IEEE T的天下吧
想知道Science发过哪些工科的高影响成果
年薪年薪
13楼2010-04-21 20:01:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

caosy1982

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
和我的情况很像,一个意见直接录,一个说创新不大,一个提了几个意见,还不知道希望如何呢。
2楼2010-02-16 23:06:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

这个杂志怎么样啊
3楼2010-02-17 10:44:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
IEEE的杂志都不错。虽然远远比不上Science和Nature,不过IEEE Transactions 杂志都不差。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by sxs2006 at 2010-02-17 10:44:53:
这个杂志怎么样啊

4楼2010-02-17 10:47:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

当然希望很大了! “应用太简单”- 看看能不能举个复杂点的例子,或个很好的解释。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by sxs2006 at 2010-02-16 18:34:26:
投稿IEEE T fuzzy systems3个月,审稿结果如下,主编给了大修,AE也给乐肯定的意见,但是三个审稿人中,有2个的意见很不错,但有一个直接拒绝了文章,主要理由是应用太简单。有经验的帮忙分析下修改后有没有希望, ...

5楼2010-02-17 10:50:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by caosy1982 at 2010-02-16 23:06:08:
和我的情况很像,一个意见直接录,一个说创新不大,一个提了几个意见,还不知道希望如何呢。

你的情况如何了,现在,录用了吗?
6楼2010-03-06 16:10:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shyh2009

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
本身这个期刊很牛的,楼主好好修改,应该会有希望的,向楼主学习啊!
7楼2010-03-06 17:26:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

碰到这种意见很尖锐的,真不知道怎么回答
8楼2010-03-06 19:04:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by sxs2006 at 2010-02-16 18:34:26:
投稿IEEE T fuzzy systems3个月,审稿结果如下,主编给了大修,AE也给乐肯定的意见,但是三个审稿人中,有2个的意见很不错,但有一个直接拒绝了文章,主要理由是应用太简单。有经验的帮忙分析下修改后有没有希望, ...

楼主,你好:请教一个问题,最近投稿到IEEE T fuzzy systems,一开始状态是Awaiting Adiminator Processing, 半个月后状态变成Under review.请问under review 这个状态是不是意味着专家外审呢?
9楼2010-04-10 06:55:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sxs2006

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by zhzimi_2007 at 2010-04-10 06:55:17:

楼主,你好:请教一个问题,最近投稿到IEEE T fuzzy systems,一开始状态是Awaiting Adiminator Processing, 半个月后状态变成Under review.请问under review 这个状态是不是意味着专家外审呢?

对,是这样的
10楼2010-04-10 15:27:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 sxs2006 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见