| 查看: 231 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
WHQ197木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
校对两小段
|
||
|
1、我们认为虽然热风干燥时，所消耗的能量并未被全部用于样品的水分蒸发，但要用该方法获得50g干品，确实要消耗1330J的能量，所以我们的测量方法是可行的。 We think that when we use hot air drying, the energy was not fully consumed to vaporize water contained in the sample. However, if we use the method to obtain dry goods of 50g , 1330J of energy is really needed. As a result our measurement method is feasible. 2、firmness是指扇贝柱的抗破碎力，我们是采用自制的螺旋加力器进行测量的，即让扇贝柱周向受力, 在螺旋加力器的作用下, 破碎时的压力值，EHD干燥的为20.5N，Oven干燥的为12.1N，但由于是自制的测量工具，未在文章给处定量表述。 “Firmness” means the anti-crushing power of scallop muscle. We measured the pressure value by a screw augmentation when the scallop muscle gets pressure from different directions. When it was broken, the pressure value in the EHD-dried scallop muscle was observed to be 20.5N, while it was 12.1N for Oven-dried scallop muscle. However, because the screw augmentation was made by ourselves, we did not describe the results of firmness in the article. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有4人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有6人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有28人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
4楼2010-02-01 18:42:26
WHQ197(金币+8): 2010-02-02 11:08
| 1.It is considered that the consumed energy was not completely used to evaporate the water remained in the sample in case of hot air drying. However, an amount of 1330J energy was indeed spent on getting 50g dry goods. So the measurement adopted here is applicable. |
2楼2010-02-01 18:24:20
WHQ197(金币+10): 2010-02-02 11:08
| 2. “Firmness” means the anti-crushing force of scallop muscle. A homemade screw augmentation was employed to measure the pressure value which is the pressure value when the scallop muscle was broken under the action of screw augmentation when tangent force was acted on it. The pressure value of EHD-dried scallop muscle was measured to be 20.5N and that of Oven-dried was 12.1N. As the equipment was homemade, the results was not quantitatively described. |
3楼2010-02-01 18:40:02