| 查看: 1320 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
两审稿人意见相左，大修应该注意什么啊
|
|||
|
最近投了一个SCI期刊，两审稿人意见很不相同，一正一反，最后编辑给了个大修的机会，让我反驳。问题是，这个据搞的审稿人从根本上否定了这篇论文的核心工作，也把我这篇论文批得一无是处，尽是毛病。关键这篇论文还是我去年发表的一篇SCI论文的后续工作,也引用了自己先前发表的SCI论文。这就意味着，这个拒稿的审稿人也将否定我先前发表的这篇论文的所有工作。面对这样苛刻的审稿人，我还真是第一回碰到，有点郁闷，不知道怎么反驳，请教大家有什么良方啊？ Reviewers have now commented on your paper, and their reviews are appended below. As you can see, the reviewers differ considerably in their evaluation of your manuscript. Reviewer 1 has serious problems with the technical approach you have taken, and offers many detailed comments on your approach. Reviewer 2 on the other hand, is more positive about your manuscript, but has some relatively minor comments as well. Given these diverging opinions, I have decided to give you the opportunity to submit a revised version of your manuscript. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point that is being raised (revision notes) together with the revised manuscript. I will then send your manuscript together with the rebuttal letter back to the reviewers, and based on their comments I will decide whether your paper is acceptable or not. Please note that you have 90 days for this revision. [ Last edited by tzczsq on 2010-1-26 at 20:39 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
337求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
又一批高校组建人工智能学院 师资行吗 不是骗人吗
已经有3人回复
-
申博/考博
已经有5人回复
-
申博
已经有3人回复
-
湖南大学刘巧玲课题组2026年第二批次博士研究生招生信息
已经有5人回复
-
求计算机方向调剂
已经有6人回复
-
通信工程求调剂！！！
已经有7人回复
-
26药学专硕105500求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
297，工科调剂?
已经有11人回复
-
申博自荐
已经有4人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
5楼2010-01-26 20:50:52
forlink
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2514.2
- 散金: 2196
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1427
- 在线: 95.3小时
- 虫号: 616191
- 注册: 2008-10-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电机与电器
2楼2010-01-26 20:17:15
3楼2010-01-26 20:20:02
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2010-01-26 20:45:26
