24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tzczsq

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 994.2
散金: 686
红花: 1
帖子: 341
在线: 263.2小时
虫号: 691159
注册: 2009-01-11
专业: 模式识别

[交流] 两审稿人意见相左，大修应该注意什么啊

最近投了一个SCI期刊，两审稿人意见很不相同，一正一反，最后编辑给了个大修的机会，让我反驳。问题是，这个据搞的审稿人从根本上否定了这篇论文的核心工作，也把我这篇论文批得一无是处，尽是毛病。关键这篇论文还是我去年发表的一篇SCI论文的后续工作,也引用了自己先前发表的SCI论文。这就意味着，这个拒稿的审稿人也将否定我先前发表的这篇论文的所有工作。面对这样苛刻的审稿人，我还真是第一回碰到，有点郁闷，不知道怎么反驳，请教大家有什么良方啊？

Reviewers have now commented on your paper, and their reviews are appended below.
As you can see, the reviewers differ considerably in their evaluation of your manuscript. Reviewer 1 has serious problems with the technical approach you have taken, and offers many detailed comments on your approach. Reviewer 2 on the other hand, is more positive about your manuscript, but has some relatively minor comments as well.

Given these diverging opinions, I have decided to give you the opportunity to submit a revised version of your manuscript. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point that is being raised (revision notes) together with the revised manuscript. I will then send your manuscript together with the rebuttal letter back to the reviewers, and based on their comments I will decide whether your paper is acceptable or not. Please note that you have 90 days for this revision.

[ Last edited by tzczsq on 2010-1-26 at 20:39 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

职称评审没过，求安慰已经有34人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有17人回复
回收溶剂求助已经有6人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿已经有22人回复
申请26博士已经有5人回复
EST投稿状态问题已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有4人回复
聘U V热熔胶研究人员已经有10人回复
求助文献已经有3人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗已经有8人回复

1楼 2010-01-26 20:04:29

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

fengyun916

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 30.3
帖子: 178
在线: 3.2小时
虫号: 591725
注册: 2008-09-02

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

实话实说，很羡慕你这样的。我最近也是1篇trans，1个同意，一个不同意，直接拒啊，哎！现在混口饭吃不容易啊！

引用回帖:

Originally posted by tzczsq at 2010-01-26 20:04:29:
最近投了一个SCI期刊，两审稿人意见很不相同，一正一反，最后编辑给了个大修的机会，让我反驳。问题是，这个据搞的审稿人从根本上否定了这篇论文的核心工作，也把我这篇论文批得一无是处，尽是毛病。关键这篇论文 ...