| ²é¿´: 341 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
zhuisuiabc123ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¼±£ºÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµÄ2¸öÎÊÌâÕæµÄ²»ÖªµÀÕ¦°ìÁË£¿
|
||
|
´ó¼Ò°ï¿´¿´ÕâÁ½¸öÎÊÌâÕ¦»Ø´ð°¡£¿²»ÖªµÀÎÊÌâ5Öеġ°up-grated ¡±ÊÇʲôÒâ˼¡£¶àлÁË 5-If smaller particles are generated through a fast nucleation and short growth kinetic then one has to see the difference of crystallinity depending on the scenarios in use to get the micropraticles. Considering the XRD Figure 8, it should be up-grated with all the different particles obtained under different synthetic pathways. Normally, nice transition from amorphous to crystalline character should occur as the nucleation kinetic diminishes. 7-Figure 10 ,dealing with dissolution that dimishes as far the particles crystallinity increases, should be up-grated with all the particles synthesized in this study. beyond it would be nice to modelize (fit) the dissolution curves, to see if they obey a first order, a second order kinetic law...or something different. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬310·Ö£¬±¾¿ÆÖصãË«·Ç£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬310·Ö£¬±¾¿ÆÖصãË«·Ç£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶311·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶306·ÖÕÒºÏÊʵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á289
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶ 285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
298Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
368»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
mandolin
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æÖ®È绨´«Ææ
- Ó¦Öú: 11 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.262
- ½ð±Ò: 5732
- É¢½ð: 4805
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 2324
- ÔÚÏß: 925.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 530484
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-21
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Á÷ÌåÁ¦Ñ§

2Â¥2010-01-18 11:02:56














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥