| ²é¿´: 342 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
zhuisuiabc123ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¼±£ºÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµÄ2¸öÎÊÌâÕæµÄ²»ÖªµÀÕ¦°ìÁË£¿
|
||
|
´ó¼Ò°ï¿´¿´ÕâÁ½¸öÎÊÌâÕ¦»Ø´ð°¡£¿²»ÖªµÀÎÊÌâ5Öеġ°up-grated ¡±ÊÇʲôÒâ˼¡£¶àлÁË 5-If smaller particles are generated through a fast nucleation and short growth kinetic then one has to see the difference of crystallinity depending on the scenarios in use to get the micropraticles. Considering the XRD Figure 8, it should be up-grated with all the different particles obtained under different synthetic pathways. Normally, nice transition from amorphous to crystalline character should occur as the nucleation kinetic diminishes. 7-Figure 10 ,dealing with dissolution that dimishes as far the particles crystallinity increases, should be up-grated with all the particles synthesized in this study. beyond it would be nice to modelize (fit) the dissolution curves, to see if they obey a first order, a second order kinetic law...or something different. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
һ־Ը³¶«´óѧ071000ÉúÎïѧѧ˶³õÊÔ·ÖÊý276Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸0807 ÊýÒ»Ó¢Ò» 313 ÓÐûÓжþÂÖµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
289 ·Ö105500ҩѧר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á-²ÄÁÏÀà-284
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
314Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©2£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
086004 Çóµ÷¼Á 309
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
mandolin
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æÖ®È绨´«Ææ
- Ó¦Öú: 11 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.262
- ½ð±Ò: 5732
- É¢½ð: 4805
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 2324
- ÔÚÏß: 925.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 530484
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-21
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Á÷ÌåÁ¦Ñ§

2Â¥2010-01-18 11:02:56













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥