24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

dshy

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 4167
散金: 10
红花: 1
沙发: 4
帖子: 824
在线: 156.1小时
虫号: 585404
注册: 2008-08-08
专业: 环境污染化学

[交流] 如何修改回复？

Reviewer #2: Article titled as; "Microwave-assisted preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of a dumbbell-shaped ZnO photocatalyst", presents the decolourization and TOC removal efficiencies of Methylene Blue with synthesized dumbbell shaped ZnO photocatalyst, only in comparison to the commercial ZnO powder. There are hundreds of such studies in literature. In order to be able to present a novelty of synthesized dumbbell shaped ZnO photocatalyst, authors should conduct a comparable work on photodegradation capabilities with nanostructured ZnO photocatalysts. For such an investigation authors have to analyse previous photodegradation studies with nanostructured ZnO (for example; C. Ye, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 15146-15151 (2006); M.L. Curri, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2003, 23, 285-289; A.J. Hoffman, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 776-785; E.R. Carraway, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 786-793;...). Article has to be re-examined
这样的审稿意见怎么修改啊？O(∩_∩)O谢谢！
我文章中已经研究了光催化性，并和商业的ZnO做了对比，不知审稿人要怎么“should conduct a comparable work on photodegradation capabilities with nanostructured ZnO photocatalysts”。

[ Last edited by dshy on 2010-1-18 at 10:23 ]

回复此楼