24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1747  |  回复: 11
当前主题已经存档。

蚂-蚁

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 被拒的审稿意见

我把编辑、主编和审稿人的总体意见贴上,大伙给看看,具体的没贴

I have received the comments of the reviewers on your manuscript.  The referees have raised a number of significant concerns about the work.  Copies of the referees' comments are listed below.  From my study of the manuscript and the referees' comments, I have reached the decision that publication would be premature.  Thus, I am rejecting the manuscript.

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Soil Science.  We would be happy to consider your future work for publication.

Editor-in-Chief: Your manuscript entitled "##############", which you submitted for consideration for publication in Soil Science, has been reviewed. Both of the reviewers have raised major concerns regarding the manuscript. A primary difficult with the presentation of your work is the state of the English presentation, many of the points you are attempting to comunicate are obscured by the English presentation. Also, major difficulties were note in the experimental design and data interpretation. Major difficulties were noted in the presentation of your experimental design, the description of the soil sample collection, and the interpretation of your data. Based on my study of the manuscript and the reviewers' comments, I am led to the conclusion that publication of the work would be premature. Thus, I must reject the manuscript. I would be happy to consider publication of a manuscript that fully addresses the concerns raised by the reviewers. Should you submit a revised manuscript, you would need to include a statement of how the original work was revised in response to each of the review comments.

I regret that the decision not to publish is necessary. I do encourage you to consider Soil Science for your future publication needs.

Reviewer #1: Overall, this manuscript is not in a publishable state.  It needs quite a bit of revision and could then be resubmitted.

Reviewer #2: The research described in this manuscript is made more difficult to understand technically by the difficult-to-understand English language usage. It would be really helpful to have an English-first author proof the text and then have a new submission.
回复此楼
在路上。。。。。。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhang6871

银虫 (正式写手)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
mandolin(金币+1,VIP+0):多谢帮助 1-12 09:55
让你好好修改修改,语言表达可能太差,人家读不懂,让你多修改几遍。不知道楼主修改几遍就投了,让英语写作能力强的人给你看了吗。
过于功利,浮躁,布满灰尘的心都是创新的杀手!多记,心静,多动手,贴近大自然!
2楼2010-01-12 09:51:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

MYMHoun

木虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
修改后重投吧,有了审稿人意见,方便有的放矢
3楼2010-01-12 10:00:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jlc夜雨

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
好好修改在投把,至少还有机会
4楼2010-01-12 13:53:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjchenghao

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
我读了一下审改意见,主要是你英文表达问题,建议多练练英文写作
5楼2010-01-14 21:41:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yckaolin

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
我看了是你的写法 不符合英语表示方法
6楼2010-01-14 21:44:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaomg

金虫 (正式写手)

足球使者


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
好好修改,语言,实验结果解释.....
嘻嘻哈哈去踢球
7楼2010-01-14 23:58:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

djjwan

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
语言关没过
审稿人是不喜欢这种文章的
仔细修改修改
建议找个大牛(发过大量英文文章的最好)改改
8楼2010-01-15 00:19:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sanlimao

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
就是 努力提高应为表达水准 还有就是怎么去解释你的数据
9楼2010-01-15 09:02:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

felicity6056

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
你的论文只是语言问题,这个应该好办的话
努力的过程讲究方法!
10楼2010-01-15 09:47:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 蚂-蚁 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +3 u1xkze8ybe 2026-07-30 7/350 2026-07-31 12:10 by syhhffkrym
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 u1xkze8ybe 2026-07-30 3/150 2026-07-31 12:08 by syhhffkrym
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 u1xkze8ybe 2026-07-30 6/300 2026-07-31 12:05 by syhhffkrym
[教师之家] 基础研究怎么拉横向,学校到款任务越来越多,难以完成 拉横向,都有哪些途径啊 +6 锦衣卫寒战 2026-07-28 6/300 2026-07-31 11:27 by syl200707
[高分子] HXDI做水性聚氨酯乳液,是不是特别容易出渣 15+3 yuyusuv 2026-07-29 3/150 2026-07-31 09:21 by huizingga
[基金申请] 小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了 +15 1234567wang 2026-07-25 19/950 2026-07-31 08:30 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2026年国自然面上资助率 +8 布布和一二 2026-07-30 8/400 2026-07-31 01:51 by alongwaytogo
[基金申请] 系统今天又提示维护了,估计离放榜不远了 +11 winnerche 2026-07-29 15/750 2026-07-30 23:08 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 微信指数没变化,科研之友没阅读 +14 wangze12014 2026-07-28 17/850 2026-07-30 20:10 by kissu88
[考博] 申请2027年材料/化学类博士 10+3 考研老狗? 2026-07-25 5/250 2026-07-30 19:33 by 白色木鱼
[基金申请] 你们的时间戳变了吗 +3 archvillain 2026-07-30 4/200 2026-07-30 18:53 by levinzhwen
[基金申请] 今年的WR进展到哪一步了? +5 wsgjhwz 2026-07-25 9/450 2026-07-30 12:59 by 可淡不可忘
[有机交流] 产物和副产物价值比较 30+4 小汤02 2026-07-27 5/250 2026-07-30 12:44 by czyzsu
[基金申请] 时间戳他又来了 +14 晓晓爱翠翠 2026-07-26 17/850 2026-07-29 16:30 by 呵呵二哥
[有机交流] 这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么? 50+4 YUAN2273 2026-07-25 7/350 2026-07-29 12:27 by xiaobenpu
[基金申请] 没消息就是被刷了呗 +13 lambert2014 2026-07-24 14/700 2026-07-29 10:38 by msh145800
[基金申请] 这种情况还有戏吗 +5 drbart 2026-07-27 11/550 2026-07-29 05:50 by drbart
[基金申请] 同事接到电话了,我却没有 +4 1234567wang 2026-07-27 4/200 2026-07-28 10:11 by GOODLUCKER
[基金申请] 准备明年的基金了 +5 Tide man 2026-07-27 5/250 2026-07-28 09:25 by newfuzzy1
[分析] 水蒸气蒸馏法乳化现象 +3 月光娇娇 2026-07-26 3/150 2026-07-26 23:25 by caiyun
信息提示
请填处理意见