| 查看: 652 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
高人看看这个意见如何回答？（相信很少有人碰到的情况）
|
|||
|
我这是提交修改稿后返回的意见，下面分别是主编和AE的意见，高人给个建议看看如何答复好啊，第一次遇到这种情况。 Editor in Chief comments ======================== I highlight the comments below regarding citing papers that are inappropriate or that do not support the arguments made by the authors. Even if the a reviewer may make suggestions, including them can lead the other reviewers and editors to question your scientific judgment. This has happened in your manuscript -- making it imperative that you look over what you have added and critically decide which should be in the manuscript. A note to the AE explaining why certain citations are omitted may be appropriate. Associate Editor comments ======================== In addition, the Reviewer’s major concern is that some of the additional references included in the author’s response to the Reviewer’s questions are either not relevant to the manuscript topic or are included in the author’s response but not in the revised manuscript. [ Last edited by HyperLee on 2009-12-26 at 09:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
浙江师范大学是怎么坑我的
已经有4人回复
-
闲聊
已经有6人回复
-
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有7人回复
-
浙江师范大学是怎么坑我的
已经有10人回复
-
求教各位大神：2026教育部人文社科青年基金项目何时公示呀？
已经有6人回复
-
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有8人回复
-
科研求助
已经有4人回复
snowgary
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2505.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 312
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 283745
- 注册: 2006-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
3楼2009-12-23 21:46:01
snowgary
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2505.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 312
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 283745
- 注册: 2006-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
2楼2009-12-23 21:45:36
4楼2009-12-23 21:53:58
5楼2009-12-26 09:34:00