| 查看: 461 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
高人看看这个意见如何回答？（相信很少有人碰到的情况）
|
|||
|
我这是提交修改稿后返回的意见，下面分别是主编和AE的意见，高人给个建议看看如何答复好啊，第一次遇到这种情况。 Editor in Chief comments ======================== I highlight the comments below regarding citing papers that are inappropriate or that do not support the arguments made by the authors. Even if the a reviewer may make suggestions, including them can lead the other reviewers and editors to question your scientific judgment. This has happened in your manuscript -- making it imperative that you look over what you have added and critically decide which should be in the manuscript. A note to the AE explaining why certain citations are omitted may be appropriate. Associate Editor comments ======================== In addition, the Reviewer’s major concern is that some of the additional references included in the author’s response to the Reviewer’s questions are either not relevant to the manuscript topic or are included in the author’s response but not in the revised manuscript. [ Last edited by HyperLee on 2009-12-26 at 09:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有8人回复
-
26申博
已经有3人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有22人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有4人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有19人回复
-
请教限项目规定
已经有3人回复
-
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有10人回复
-
基金申报
已经有6人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有13人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
snowgary
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2505.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 312
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 283745
- 注册: 2006-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
2楼2009-12-23 21:45:36
snowgary
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2505.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 312
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 283745
- 注册: 2006-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
3楼2009-12-23 21:46:01
4楼2009-12-23 21:53:58
5楼2009-12-26 09:34:00
6楼2009-12-26 11:44:23