| 查看: 602 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
高人看看这个意见如何回答？（相信很少有人碰到的情况）
|
|||
|
我这是提交修改稿后返回的意见，下面分别是主编和AE的意见，高人给个建议看看如何答复好啊，第一次遇到这种情况。 Editor in Chief comments ======================== I highlight the comments below regarding citing papers that are inappropriate or that do not support the arguments made by the authors. Even if the a reviewer may make suggestions, including them can lead the other reviewers and editors to question your scientific judgment. This has happened in your manuscript -- making it imperative that you look over what you have added and critically decide which should be in the manuscript. A note to the AE explaining why certain citations are omitted may be appropriate. Associate Editor comments ======================== In addition, the Reviewer’s major concern is that some of the additional references included in the author’s response to the Reviewer’s questions are either not relevant to the manuscript topic or are included in the author’s response but not in the revised manuscript. [ Last edited by HyperLee on 2009-12-26 at 09:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有18人回复
-
基础研究怎么拉横向，学校到款任务越来越多，难以完成 拉横向，都有哪些途径啊
已经有8人回复
-
HXDI做水性聚氨酯乳液，是不是特别容易出渣
已经有3人回复
-
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有19人回复
-
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有8人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有15人回复
-
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有5人回复
-
你们的时间戳变了吗
已经有4人回复
-
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有9人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
snowgary
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2505.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 312
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 283745
- 注册: 2006-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
2楼2009-12-23 21:45:36
snowgary
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2505.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 312
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 283745
- 注册: 2006-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
3楼2009-12-23 21:46:01
4楼2009-12-23 21:53:58
5楼2009-12-26 09:34:00
6楼2009-12-26 11:44:23