24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1338  |  回复: 15
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Jimmyoung

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] IEEE Trans Energy Conversion初审结果,请各位帮忙鉴定(已确定接收,谢谢各位)

3个月前投的文章,今天终于有消息了,刚刚好3个月

编辑给的结果是:
After careful review we have determined that your paper might be
of interest for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Energy
Conversion, after revisions, if those revisions fully and
properly address the concerns of the reviewers. The comments
from the reviewers appearing below may include specific
revisions that are mandatory and other changes suggested. You
may have to make broader changes if necessary based on general
comments provided by the reviewers.

I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance. It is, rather, a recognition by our reviewers and editors that there appears to be something of interest in your paper. Your revision will be reviewed by the same reviewers who read the current draft.

Please submit your revised paper within 60 days of receiving this letter.  After 60 days the revision will expire and you will need an extension in order to submit the revised paper.
不知道是不是套话,反正看了半天也不知道到底行还不行,能归类成大修还是小修?

而且奇怪的是只有2个审稿意见,都很短:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I think that this paper is profitable. However, I want to confirm the following item.
中间3行省略。This is a bad direction for the system. The author should refer this respect with paper.

这第一个提出了一个之前没有仔细考虑的问题,但是不是文章讨论的主要问题,只能说是一个侧面问题,各位看看是不是很强硬,有没有灵活余地?

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
The paper is very well written and presents a novel work which can increase the security of......
The authors have well presented the problem and their proposed solution.
Eventhough there is no experimental work which validates the theory, I consider the way the simulations were conducted can be convincing enough about the effectiveness of the method.
第二个意见貌似很好啊,不用改了么?

第一次投trans,请各位赐教,多谢

另外,编辑的这封信还用回复么?还是等着修改完提交就好?

11月20日提交的修改稿,只修改了4天,因为没有提太多意见
今天,11月24日就收到录用通知了
多谢各位!

[ Last edited by Jimmyoung on 2009-11-24 at 22:47 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Jimmyoung

木虫 (正式写手)

谢楼上
第二个人就是顺着他的意见说一下就可以了吧
3楼2009-11-16 23:06:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

wordadobe

铜虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这篇文章基本上问题不大了,以我的经验

最好把第二个人的问题也回复一下,说一下模拟的作用
软件驱动生产力
2楼2009-11-16 23:02:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Jimmyoung

木虫 (正式写手)

投过IEEE PES其他期刊的也帮忙看看
多谢
4楼2009-11-17 09:06:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Jimmyoung

木虫 (正式写手)

这帖子沉得也太快了吧,这里篝火
我导师的意见是回复中对于第二个人只表示感谢,但是他也不确定是否能录用
5楼2009-11-17 17:02:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见