| 查看: 994 | 回复: 12 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
davidwn金虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
审稿人都说好，编辑却还是不录怎么办？
|
|
|
具体如下： Editor’s Reply: Attached are the reviews for your manuscript. While the reviewers did not find anything major wrong with the manuscript, I judge it to have insufficient depth and not to be of sufficient interest to most of the I&ECR readership. Thus I suggest that you submit it elsewhere to a materials synthesis oriented journal. You may wish to consider submitting your manuscript to a more specialized journal; I hope that the reviewers' comments are of some use. Reviewer 1: This is a well-written paper with interesting results….. Reviewer 2: The paper focused on the .XX preparation, it is very important for clean coal technology and green-house gas control. XX was involved and the characterization was investigated in depth. It showed strong originality innovation. It is suitable for Journal publication. However some minor problem existed, hence minor revision before publishing was suggested. 但是，由于该编辑（也是该刊物的副主编）主要是做数值模拟的，和本文的研究领域并不相符，请问我该怎么办？是向主编申述还是把我的文章发给大牛请求他们推荐？如果我就想在该刊物发表我的论文的话。 [ Last edited by davidwn on 2009-11-5 at 21:17 ] |
回复此楼
4楼2009-11-05 22:10:02
今天来灌水
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 110 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.005
- 金币: 8321.6
- 散金: 947
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 4554
- 在线: 745.7小时
- 虫号: 576005
- 注册: 2008-06-19
2楼2009-11-05 21:45:00
maqin909
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 18351.2
- 散金: 1218
- 红花: 3
- 沙发: 21
- 帖子: 4762
- 在线: 1389.5小时
- 虫号: 280238
- 注册: 2006-09-17
- 专业: 冶金物理化学与冶金原理
3楼2009-11-05 21:51:02
5楼2009-11-05 23:46:56
20