24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 1795  |  回复: 22
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chenfire

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 有意思的经历——遭遇审稿人“寻仇”

5月份投的一篇文章,被一个审稿人拒稿后仍被编辑接收并且发表了。
详情:http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1421078
现在新文章又落到了他手上,他对新文章倒是没意见,但对旧文章仍然耿耿于怀,以下是他的审稿意见:


This manuscript presents more experimental results of XXXX. The authors just published a communication in XXXX. I was also a reviewer for that paper. My main comment is that the manuscript should include more experimental data by XXXX, and should be changed to a full paper for publication. It is obvious that the first paper was accepted for publication as a communication without taking my comments seriously. This second paper demonstrates additional data in the same topic by changing the experimental conditions, such as XXXX. Some parts of the paper have been already shown in the first paper, e.g. Fig. 7(a) and the corresponding text.

The most important problem is that these two papers XXXX. In their first paper, they concluded XXXX. To confirm this conclusion, I suggested that some experiments should be performed. They did not do as I suggested. Now they must have done some more experiments and present a new conclusion. This new statement seems to be more reasonable. However, the authors should discuss the different models presented in their own papers. I would like to see whether the previous conclusion is still correct. If not, please tell us why?   

Since the paper contains some new results (as far as I understand), I suggest it can be accepted for publication. A few revisions should be considered by the authors:

后面提了三个小问题:1, 参考文献2引用有问题。 2,一个图的说明要详细点。3,某个方面的参考文献要加多几篇。


上一篇文章他提出来的问题我们已经详细解释过了,编辑看后同意我们的观点,直接接收了文章,没把回复意见给他看,所以他至今还没跟我们交流过。都已经过了好几个月了,老外的科研态度真是严肃、执着啊!太佩服了!

[ Last edited by chenfire on 2009-10-25 at 14:45 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hfut1879

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
呵呵这种情况还算是比较正常的啊
3楼2009-10-25 15:22:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答
2楼2009-10-25 14:55:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuss2005

木虫 (著名写手)

这种情况还算是比较正常的啊
4楼2009-10-25 15:28:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shuxuei

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by chenfire at 2009-10-25 14:41:
5月份投的一篇文章,被一个审稿人拒稿后仍被编辑接收并且发表了。
详情:http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1421078
现在新文章又落到了他手上,他对新文章倒是没意见,但对旧文章仍然耿耿于 ...

正常情况!做学问确实要严谨啊!
5楼2009-10-25 16:11:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 一志愿沪9,326求生物学调剂 +11 刘墨墨 2026-04-13 11/550 2026-04-17 15:35 by wanganpin
[考研] 304求调剂 +6 castLight 2026-04-16 6/300 2026-04-17 10:34 by 一切OK
[考研] 一志愿华中农业071010,320求调剂 +15 困困困困坤坤 2026-04-14 17/850 2026-04-17 09:32 by licg0208
[考研] 22408 312求调剂 +23 门路摸摸 2026-04-14 25/1250 2026-04-16 21:21 by Art1977
[考研] 291求调剂 +11 关忆北. 2026-04-14 11/550 2026-04-16 15:18 by jiahl2024
[考研] 297,工科调剂?河南农业大学本科 +14 河南农业大学-能 2026-04-14 14/700 2026-04-16 14:41 by dingyanbo1
[考研] 327求调剂 +26 Xxjc1107. 2026-04-13 29/1450 2026-04-16 10:52 by Espannnnnol
[考研] 279学硕食品专业求调剂院校 20+7 孤独的狼爱吃羊 2026-04-12 29/1450 2026-04-16 09:00 by screening
[考研] 求调剂学校 +14 不会吃肉 2026-04-13 16/800 2026-04-15 21:59 by noqvsozv
[考研] 求调剂 +11 小聂爱学习 2026-04-11 15/750 2026-04-15 21:57 by noqvsozv
[考研] 生物学调剂 +9 纸扇zhishan 2026-04-13 9/450 2026-04-15 18:28 by AN流800
[考研] 化工学硕294分,求导师收留 +32 yzyzx 2026-04-12 36/1800 2026-04-14 17:45 by lhj2009
[教师之家] 转长聘了 +7 简单化xn 2026-04-13 7/350 2026-04-14 14:50 by xindong
[考研] 求调剂,985材料与化工348分 +9 涵竹刘 2026-04-11 14/700 2026-04-13 22:26 by 涵竹刘
[考研] B区0809 ,数一英一,290 求调剂 +3 泠潍1111 2026-04-12 4/200 2026-04-13 20:35 by 学员JpLReM
[考研] 一志愿085802 323分求调剂 +13 drizzle_9 2026-04-12 14/700 2026-04-13 10:26 by Faiz5552
[考研] 调剂结束 +6 floriea 2026-04-12 8/400 2026-04-12 18:13 by zhouxiaoyu
[考研] 331求调剂 +5 王国帅 2026-04-11 5/250 2026-04-11 22:56 by 溪涧流水
[考研] 广东省 085601 329分求调剂 +14 Eddieddd 2026-04-10 14/700 2026-04-11 09:58 by bljnqdcc
[考研] 263能源动力专硕求调剂 +4 加大号饭盒袋 2026-04-10 4/200 2026-04-10 20:52 by gong120082
信息提示
请填处理意见