24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 479  |  回复: 1
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者封印一将赠送您 15 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

封印一

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求大佬帮忙看下,加氢及精修方式的描述是否正确已有1人参与

在一个晶体精修中,水和羟基上的H是通过Q峰确定,并直接精修的,没有限制O-H的键长,C上的H是通过“Add H”操作直接产生的,但ins文件中有“Bond $H”命令,不指导这个命令是限制什么的?
现在审稿人要求对水及羟基上H的精修与其它H的精修分开来描述,具体意见“1. Section 2.3 of the manuscript states, not quite correctly, that H atoms in both structures were located geometrically and refined isotropically. This should be corrected to indicate that the water and hydroxyl H atoms were refined independently and the rest were placed at geometrically established positions and refined as riding atoms. It is important to indicate that the important H atoms, H1 and H2, were located experimentally -- or not, as the case may be.”
查阅了些资料,把描述改成了“Hydrogen atoms of water and hydroxyl were positioned using the difference Fourier maps and refined without extra constraints, while other H atoms were located geometrically and refined as riding atoms. All H atoms are refined isotropically.”不知道这样的描述是否正确,还请大佬指点,谢谢。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 封印一 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见