| 查看: 523 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[交流]
请问这样的审稿意见修改后被接受的可能性有多大？
|
||
|
请问这样的审稿意见修改后被接受的可能性有多大？ 编辑给的决定是“修改后再审”。 审稿人的意见是： “In this paper, authors experimental studied ××××. I think that this paper is contains meaningful experimental results, it can be considered to publish after minor revision of the following points: 1. Compared the ×××, what is the major deference of ××× during the experiment? 2. The A and B are the main factors of the enrichments of *** during the experimental conditions, however, I believe there are many other factors will affect the ***. ” 请问如何修改呢？这是ninor revision 还是major revision，修改后是编辑决定还是再由审稿人审呢？我看杂志上的状态还是 under review. 谢谢 刚才发到论文写作里了，发现可能不对，所以我发这里一次！不是灌水啊，呵呵 |
回复此楼
2楼2009-10-18 21:42:21
3楼2009-10-18 21:50:16
4楼2009-10-18 22:41:17
