| ²é¿´: 1166 | »Ø¸´: 9 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
zhaofeng3211ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿Ñ»··ü°²Ñõ»¯»¹Ô·å¿ÉÄæÐÔ
|
||
|
Ò»ÖÖÎïÖÊÔڵ缫ÉÏ»¹Ô£¬ÎÒÃÇÏ£ÍûËüµÄÑ»··ü°²Ñõ»¯»¹Ô·å¿ÉÄæÐԺû¹ÊÇÏ£ÍûËüÖ»Óл¹Ô·åûÓÐÑõ»¯·å£¿ [ Last edited by zhaofeng3211 on 2009-10-15 at 23:06 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çൺ´óѧ¹Ì̬µç³ØÑо¿ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§¡¢ÎïÀíµÈ·½Ïò²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ33È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì085602 305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ210È˻ظ´
È£²¡ÓëÑÀÖܲ¡µÄ±íÊö
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧȫ¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÑîÓ¦¿ü½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÄâÕÐ17-19λ˶²©Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶½ÓÊÜ¿çרҵµ÷¼Á£¨ÖØÇìÊÐÊô¸ßУ£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧȫ¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÑîÓ¦¿ü½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÄâÕÐ17-19λ˶²©Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
070300 »¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶ ³õÊÔ357·Ö bÇøÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÉϺ£¹¤³Ì¼¼Êõ´óѧÉú̬Ó빦ÄÜ·Ä֯Ʒ¿ª·¢Ñо¿ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕѧ˶ר˶Ñо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
»ªÄÏÀí¹¤0703Çóµ÷¼Á£¬×Ü·Ö336ËÄÁù¼¶Òѹý
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´

zhaofeng3211
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- ECEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.024
- ½ð±Ò: 3661.1
- É¢½ð: 160
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 679
- ÔÚÏß: 296.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 547107
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-16
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§

2Â¥2009-10-15 23:07:17
ilnectar
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 104.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 107
- ÔÚÏß: 22.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 606122
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-18
- רҵ: ÀíÂۺͼÆË㻯ѧ
¡ï ¡ï
zhaofeng3211(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0): 10-16 09:26
zhaofeng3211(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0): 10-16 20:14
zhaofeng3211(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0): 10-16 09:26
zhaofeng3211(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0): 10-16 20:14
|
It is really hard to answer no matter who saw the question in the way you asked. During the cyclic voltammetry test, the redox reaction on the surface of electrode could be considered in the state of equilibrium ideally but not as reversible one, when applied certain potential in a flash. The reduction wave or oxidation one may appear or not, but absolutely is dependent on your sweep range. So the key point about your question is about what you will expect to obtain from the CV, I think. I kown your research would focus on reduction of some substance, but there are many detailed information you should devote your attention as a potent parameter at the same time. |
3Â¥2009-10-16 06:10:15
sunhongyanljw
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 183.8
- Ìû×Ó: 128
- ÔÚÏß: 1.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 454214
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-08
¡ï
zhaofeng3211(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0): 10-16 09:26
zhaofeng3211(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0): 10-16 09:26
| ÎïÖÊÔڵ缫Éϵķ´Ó¦ÄãÓ¦¸Ã°´ÕÕʵ¼ÊÎÊÌâÀ´·ÖÎö£¬¶ø²»Êǰ´³£¹æÔõôÑù£¬±ÈÈç˵Niµç¼«ÉÏ»·¼º´¼µÄ·´Ó¦¾ÍºÜ¸´ÔÓ£¬ÏÈÊÇNiµç¼«±»Ñõ»¯³ÉNi2+ºÍNi3+£¬Ö®ºóNi3+ÔÙÑõ»¯»·¼º´¼£¬ÕâÑù˵µÄ»°£¬ÔÚ×öÑ»··ü°²Ê±¾ÍÓÐNi2+ºÍNi3+µÄÑõ»¯»¹Ô·å¡£¶øÇÒ¶Ô³ÆÐÔ»¹¿ÉÒÔ¡£ËùÒÔÖ»ÄÜ¿´Êµ¼ÊÌåϵ¡£ |
4Â¥2009-10-16 08:49:55
dodolook165
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 35 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.8
- É¢½ð: 561
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 618
- ÔÚÏß: 183.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 458295
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö

5Â¥2009-10-16 09:01:05
zhaofeng3211
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- ECEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.024
- ½ð±Ò: 3661.1
- É¢½ð: 160
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 679
- ÔÚÏß: 296.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 547107
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-16
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§

6Â¥2009-10-16 09:46:35
ilnectar
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 104.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 107
- ÔÚÏß: 22.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 606122
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-18
- רҵ: ÀíÂۺͼÆË㻯ѧ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
I think I know your case now but that is really a question on methodology. Objectively, it is impossible to recognize the potential range in reduction before CV, except for following related research papers. When doing research in reduction, it is a tradition to begin the scan in negative direction forward. During the cycle, oxidation wave may appear or disappear when scan turn around to more positive potential than the incipient one you set before. So there is not any necessity whether the disappearance of oxidation wave will be better in CV. If there is signal of anode current, you can better understand more properties on electrode surface. So it is totally dependent on your experiment design and your analysis from CV diagram. |
7Â¥2009-10-16 20:23:15
maymay9288
½ð³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 879.5
- É¢½ð: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 46
- ÔÚÏß: 8.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 715657
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-05
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| Ñ»··ü°²·¨ÖеçѹµÄɨÃè¹ý³Ì°üÀ¨Òõ¼«ÓëÑô¼«Á½¸ö·½Ïò£¬Òò´Ë´ÓËùµÃµÄÑ»··ü°²·¨Í¼µÄÑõ»¯²¨ºÍ»¹Ô²¨µÄ·å¸ßºÍ¶Ô³ÆÐÔÖпÉÅжϵç»îÐÔÎïÖÊÔڵ缫±íÃæ·´Ó¦µÄ¿ÉÄæ³Ì¶È¡£Èô·´Ó¦ÊÇ¿ÉÄæµÄ£¬ÔòÇúÏßÉÏ϶Գƣ¬Èô·´Ó¦²»¿ÉÄæ£¬ÔòÇúÏßÉÏϲ»¶Ô³Æ¡£Ëüͨ³£×÷Ϊ¶¨ÐÔ·ÖÎö£¬°ïÖúÁ˽ⷴӦ»úÀíµÄ¡£¿ÉÒÔͨ¹ýÆäËû·½·¨£¨ÈçÌí¼Ó¼Á¼ÓÈ룩À´¸Ä±äÆä¿ÉÄæÐÔ´Ó¶øµÃµ½ÄãÏëÒªµÄ¸ü¶à²úÎï¡£ |
8Â¥2009-10-17 09:33:53
dodolook165
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 35 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.8
- É¢½ð: 561
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 618
- ÔÚÏß: 183.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 458295
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö

9Â¥2009-10-17 09:56:52
acui1984
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 88.5
- É¢½ð: 10
- Ìû×Ó: 19
- ÔÚÏß: 2.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 741339
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-06
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
1 ¿ÉÄæ·´Ó¦µÄÅбð ¶ÔÓÚ·´Ó¦²úÎïÎȶ¨µÄ¿ÉÄæÌåϵ£¬ÆäÑ»··ü°²Í¼ÓÐÁ½¸öÖØÒªµÄÌØÕ÷£º £¨1£©¦òIpa ¦ô=¦òIpc ¦ô£¬¼´ £¬²¢ÓëµçÊÆÉ¨ÃèËÙÂÊ£¬×ª»»µçÊÆ ºÍÀ©É¢ÏµÊýµÈ²ÎÊýÎ޹ء£ £¨2£©¦ò¡÷ ¦ô=¦ò ¦ô¡Ö ¡Ö mV£¨25¡æ£©£¬¿ÉÒÔÀûÓÃʵÑé²â¶¨µÄÑ»··ü°²Í¼À´¼ø±ðµç¼«¹ý³ÌÊÇ·ñÊÜÖÆÓÚÀ©É¢´«ÖÊ¿ØÖÆ£¬»òÕߵ绯ѧ²½ÖèÊÇ·ñ´¦ÔÚ¿ÉÄæ×´Ì¬¡£ |
10Â¥2009-10-20 18:58:47














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

