| 查看: 975 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
投稿意见求助
|
|||
|
不好意思。我弄全面点。还请各位看看，文章录用的希望大吗？谢谢各位！ Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject the manuscript as is but I encourage you to resubmit the manuscript. Reviewer #1: （一审专家） In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( X ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( X ) Yes ( ) No In short, if you think it is far below your minimum criteria of literary and scientific excellent, please give us your frank negative assessment of at your earliest convenience (with one week, may we hope?) ( ) Reject If you think it is worth publishing in JZUS, could you please finish the following report in 30 days? Paper title : Accumulation of 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori.L (Please tick appropriate) Is the work original? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper suitable for the journal? ( X ) Yes ( ) No If no, which journal would be more appropriate?: The technical content of the paper in terms of theory is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( X ) Moderate ( ) Poor Application is ( ) Excellent ( X ) Good ( ) Moderate ( ) Poor Are the references adequate? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper clearly and well structured? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Should the paper be shortened or rearranged? ( ) Yes ( X ) No Is the quality of the figured (labeling, size, reproduction) sufficient? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Overall paper rating: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( X ) Moderate ( ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Reviewer #2: （二审专家） In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( x ) Yes ( ) No In short, if you think it is far below your minimum criteria of literary and scientific excellent, please give us your frank negative assessment of at your earliest convenience (with one week, may we hope?) ( ) Reject If you think it is worth publishing in JZUS, could you please finish the following report in 30 days? Paper title : (Please tick appropriate) Is the work original? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper suitable for the journal? ( x ) Yes ( ) No If no, which journal would be more appropriate?: The technical content of the paper in terms of theory is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( x ) Moderate ( ) Poor Application is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor Are the references adequate? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper clearly and well structured? ( ) Yes ( x ) No Should the paper be shortened or rearranged? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the quality of the figured (labeling, size, reproduction) sufficient? ( ) Yes ( x ) No Overall paper rating: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有85人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有9人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有10人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有4人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有15人回复
-
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有9人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有25人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有6人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有3人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有26人回复
antiq
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4109.6
- 散金: 6862
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 5563
- 在线: 690.2小时
- 虫号: 760200
- 注册: 2009-04-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 计算数学与科学工程计算
2楼2009-10-13 14:20:12
3楼2009-10-13 14:33:40
sanshyuan 
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 2883.8
- 散金: 12412
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 2897
- 在线: 482.7小时
- 虫号: 543520
- 注册: 2008-04-11
- 专业: 机械测试理论与技术
4楼2009-10-13 14:33:42
5楼2009-10-13 14:36:23
6楼2009-10-13 15:00:15
7楼2009-10-14 08:44:38
