| 查看: 948 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
投稿意见求助
|
|||
|
不好意思。我弄全面点。还请各位看看，文章录用的希望大吗？谢谢各位！ Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject the manuscript as is but I encourage you to resubmit the manuscript. Reviewer #1: （一审专家） In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( X ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( X ) Yes ( ) No In short, if you think it is far below your minimum criteria of literary and scientific excellent, please give us your frank negative assessment of at your earliest convenience (with one week, may we hope?) ( ) Reject If you think it is worth publishing in JZUS, could you please finish the following report in 30 days? Paper title : Accumulation of 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori.L (Please tick appropriate) Is the work original? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper suitable for the journal? ( X ) Yes ( ) No If no, which journal would be more appropriate?: The technical content of the paper in terms of theory is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( X ) Moderate ( ) Poor Application is ( ) Excellent ( X ) Good ( ) Moderate ( ) Poor Are the references adequate? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper clearly and well structured? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Should the paper be shortened or rearranged? ( ) Yes ( X ) No Is the quality of the figured (labeling, size, reproduction) sufficient? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Overall paper rating: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( X ) Moderate ( ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Reviewer #2: （二审专家） In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( x ) Yes ( ) No In short, if you think it is far below your minimum criteria of literary and scientific excellent, please give us your frank negative assessment of at your earliest convenience (with one week, may we hope?) ( ) Reject If you think it is worth publishing in JZUS, could you please finish the following report in 30 days? Paper title : (Please tick appropriate) Is the work original? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper suitable for the journal? ( x ) Yes ( ) No If no, which journal would be more appropriate?: The technical content of the paper in terms of theory is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( x ) Moderate ( ) Poor Application is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor Are the references adequate? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper clearly and well structured? ( ) Yes ( x ) No Should the paper be shortened or rearranged? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the quality of the figured (labeling, size, reproduction) sufficient? ( ) Yes ( x ) No Overall paper rating: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
b口会评
已经有6人回复
-
信息学部会评时间
已经有3人回复
-
祈祷青基必中
已经有9人回复
-
在职考研
已经有7人回复
-
MSER送审了还被拒稿
已经有5人回复
-
关于如何从代码看上不上会
已经有14人回复
-
硝基还原
已经有5人回复
-
化学口会评？应用基础研究和基础研究，希望能分开
已经有3人回复
-
今年E04面上
已经有21人回复
-
大龄残疾硕士的一点执念
已经有22人回复
antiq
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4109.6
- 散金: 6862
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 5563
- 在线: 690.2小时
- 虫号: 760200
- 注册: 2009-04-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 计算数学与科学工程计算
2楼2009-10-13 14:20:12
3楼2009-10-13 14:33:40
sanshyuan 
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 2883.8
- 散金: 12412
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 2897
- 在线: 482.7小时
- 虫号: 543520
- 注册: 2008-04-11
- 专业: 机械测试理论与技术
4楼2009-10-13 14:33:42
5楼2009-10-13 14:36:23
6楼2009-10-13 15:00:15
7楼2009-10-14 08:44:38