| ²é¿´: 805 | »Ø¸´: 6 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
shiqiansansiͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
Ͷ¸åÒâ¼ûÇóÖú
|
||
|
²»ºÃÒâ˼¡£ÎÒÅªÈ«Ãæµã¡£»¹Çë¸÷λ¿´¿´£¬ÎÄÕ¼ÓõÄÏ£Íû´óÂð£¿Ð»Ð»¸÷λ£¡ Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject the manuscript as is but I encourage you to resubmit the manuscript. Reviewer #1: £¨Ò»Éóר¼Ò£© In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( X ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( X ) Yes ( ) No In short, if you think it is far below your minimum criteria of literary and scientific excellent, please give us your frank negative assessment of at your earliest convenience (with one week, may we hope?) ( ) Reject If you think it is worth publishing in JZUS, could you please finish the following report in 30 days? Paper title : Accumulation of 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori.L (Please tick appropriate) Is the work original? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper suitable for the journal? ( X ) Yes ( ) No If no, which journal would be more appropriate?: The technical content of the paper in terms of theory is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( X ) Moderate ( ) Poor Application is ( ) Excellent ( X ) Good ( ) Moderate ( ) Poor Are the references adequate? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper clearly and well structured? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Should the paper be shortened or rearranged? ( ) Yes ( X ) No Is the quality of the figured (labeling, size, reproduction) sufficient? ( X ) Yes ( ) No Overall paper rating: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( X ) Moderate ( ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Reviewer #2: £¨¶þÉóר¼Ò£© In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( x ) Yes ( ) No In short, if you think it is far below your minimum criteria of literary and scientific excellent, please give us your frank negative assessment of at your earliest convenience (with one week, may we hope?) ( ) Reject If you think it is worth publishing in JZUS, could you please finish the following report in 30 days? Paper title : (Please tick appropriate) Is the work original? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper suitable for the journal? ( x ) Yes ( ) No If no, which journal would be more appropriate?: The technical content of the paper in terms of theory is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( x ) Moderate ( ) Poor Application is ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor Are the references adequate? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper clearly and well structured? ( ) Yes ( x ) No Should the paper be shortened or rearranged? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the quality of the figured (labeling, size, reproduction) sufficient? ( ) Yes ( x ) No Overall paper rating: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ39È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÈÕÓÉúÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
µ÷¼ÁÇóÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á£¬985²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤348·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
266Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤³Ìµç×ÓÐÅÏ¢£¬±¾¿Æ»ñ¶àÏî¹ú½±ºÍÊ¡½±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
270Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
antiq
ľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4109.6
- É¢½ð: 6862
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 5563
- ÔÚÏß: 690.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 760200
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-29
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¼ÆËãÊýѧÓë¿ÆÑ§¹¤³Ì¼ÆËã
2Â¥2009-10-13 14:20:12
shiqiansansi
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 175.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 89
- ÔÚÏß: 17.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 388242
- ×¢²á: 2007-05-31
- רҵ: Ñø²Ïѧ
3Â¥2009-10-13 14:33:40
sanshyuan
¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 2883.8
- É¢½ð: 12412
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2897
- ÔÚÏß: 482.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 543520
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-11
- רҵ: »úе²âÊÔÀíÂÛÓë¼¼Êõ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
ºÃºÃÐÞ¸Äһϣ¬ÔÙͶ£¬»¹ÊǺÜÓÐÏ£Íû¡£ ±à¼¶¼ÕâÑù˵ÁË¡£Ó¦¸Ã»¹ÊÇÓÐÏ·µÄ¡£ |
4Â¥2009-10-13 14:33:42
impcas
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1205.4
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 256
- ÔÚÏß: 15.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 856778
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-25
- רҵ: ºË¼¼Êõ¼°ÆäÓ¦ÓÃ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ºÃºÃÔÙÕå×Ãһϣ¬×ÐϸµØ¿´¿´ËûÃǸøÄãµÄÒâ¼û£¬È»ºóÔÙÐÞ¶©¡£ |
5Â¥2009-10-13 14:36:23
shiqiansansi
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 175.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 89
- ÔÚÏß: 17.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 388242
- ×¢²á: 2007-05-31
- רҵ: Ñø²Ïѧ
6Â¥2009-10-13 15:00:15
shiqiansansi
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 175.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 89
- ÔÚÏß: 17.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 388242
- ×¢²á: 2007-05-31
- רҵ: Ñø²Ïѧ
7Â¥2009-10-14 08:44:38













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥