24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1888  |  回复: 13
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ljq2008

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 请教有关“multiple range tests.”

  各位同仁,现遇一句话不太清楚“Please do not use multiple range tests.
”。我在多重比较时,用的是Duncan,而该刊有的文章用的是Tukey,请问“multiple range tests”与多重比较有什么关系?multiple range tests具体指什么?请不吝赐教?谢谢!!!

补充:“Please do not use multiple range tests.” 这句话是在投稿说明里的,我现在还未投稿。

Guideline中的原文描述如下:
Material and Methods: the Materials and methods section should include full details of the statistical techniques used and authors are advised to refer to the article "Guidance for the use and presentation of statistics" in Weed Research (1988) 28, 139-144. This guide is to be updated shortly.   Preference is given to the presentation of standard errors of differences between means with appropriate degrees of freedom, rather than least significant differences in tables. Standard errors, etc., should be given to one more decimal place than the means to which they apply. Please do not use multiple range tests.

[ Last edited by ljq2008 on 2009-10-11 at 10:22 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhuiuc

至尊木虫 (正式写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
SHY31(金币+5,VIP+0):谢谢积极回答,给予专家奖励 10-11 09:36
从wiki上摘录的,国内是不是wiki被屏蔽了??另外,虫友门要善于用google等搜索工具,很多知识网上都有,实在不行再来问

Duncan's new multiple range test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In statistics, Duncan's new multiple range test (MRT) is a multiple comparison procedure developed by David B. Duncan in 1955. Duncan's MRT belongs to the general class of multiple comparison procedures that use the studentized range statistic qr to compare sets of means.

Duncan's new multiple range test (MRT) is a variant of the Student–Newman–Keuls method that uses increasing alpha levels to calculate the critical values in each step of the Newman–Keuls procedure. Duncan's MRT attempts to control family wise error rate (FWE) at αew = 1 − (1 − αpc)k−1 when comparing k, where k is the number of groups. This results in higher FWE than unmodified Newman–Keuls procedure which has FWE of αew = 1 − (1 − αpc)k/2.

David B. Duncan developed this test as a modification of the Student–Newman–Keuls method that would have greater power. Duncan's MRT is especially protective against false negative (Type II) error at the expense of having a greater risk of making false positive (Type I) errors. Duncan's test is commonly used in agronomy and other agricultural research.

Duncan's test has been criticised as being too liberal by many statisticians including Henry Scheffé, and John W. Tukey. Duncan argued that a more liberal procedure was appropriate because in real world practice the global null hypothesis H0= "All means are equal" is often false and thus traditional statisticians overprotect a probably false null hypothesis against type I errors. Duncan later developed the Duncan–Waller test which is based on Bayesian principles. It uses the obtained value of F to estimate the prior probability of the null hypothesis being true.

The main criticisms raised against Duncan's procedure are:

    * Duncan's MRT does not control family wise error rate at the nominal alpha level, a problem it inherits from Student–Newman–Keuls method.
    * The increased power of Duncan's MRT over Newman–Keuls comes from intentionally raising the alpha levels (Type I error rate) in each step of the Newman–Keuls procedure and not from any real improvement on the SNK method.

[ Last edited by jhuiuc on 2009-10-11 at 06:52 ]
7楼2009-10-11 06:50:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

liujunhero

新虫 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献文献杰出贡献


ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
就是多重比较的意思啊
3楼2009-10-10 22:27:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tfj1123

木虫 (著名写手)


ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
呵呵,帮顶一个~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4楼2009-10-10 23:14:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

球球棒棒

新虫 (正式写手)


ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
这个最好去专业版块咨询一下。
5楼2009-10-11 00:33:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 4/200 2026-08-11 02:02 by 旁观2020
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +4 wwncly 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 22:07 by demonstreets
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +3 Tide man 2026-08-10 3/150 2026-08-10 21:48 by GZUZM
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +10 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 11/550 2026-08-10 18:47 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来 +17 且听虎啸 2026-08-07 24/1200 2026-08-10 18:35 by zhangduo2008
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +8 家与远方 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-10 17:09 by 六两废铜
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +4 布布和一二 2026-08-10 4/200 2026-08-10 14:50 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 8月时间戳变的,举个手。玩一下,释放压力 +11 archvillain 2026-08-04 13/650 2026-08-10 14:41 by seekfind
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] 这样的filecode谁见过 +11 布布和一二 2026-08-08 22/1100 2026-08-10 11:10 by wmfsnow
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量 +5 yang182083 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-08 18:29 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 听说今天filecode变了 +24 布布和一二 2026-08-06 47/2350 2026-08-07 16:02 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] filecode +8 布布和一二 2026-08-06 11/550 2026-08-06 20:41 by tangpu318
[基金申请] 求各位大神看下 100+6 hpkpkpkp 2026-08-05 33/1650 2026-08-06 14:49 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] 影响面上的因素 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-05 11/550 2026-08-06 10:41 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 好消息?这个有何含义??? +8 Tide man 2026-08-05 10/500 2026-08-05 16:14 by xmuxiaoyu
[基金申请] 纯娱乐,不喜欢勿喷 +7 Tide man 2026-08-04 10/500 2026-08-04 15:10 by loufangrui
信息提示
请填处理意见