应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 请教有关“multiple range tests.”
141/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 1496  |  回复: 13
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前主题已经存档。

ljq2008

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 请教有关“multiple range tests.”

　　各位同仁，现遇一句话不太清楚“Please do not use multiple range tests.
”。我在多重比较时，用的是Duncan，而该刊有的文章用的是Tukey，请问“multiple range tests”与多重比较有什么关系？multiple range tests具体指什么？请不吝赐教？谢谢！！！

补充：“Please do not use multiple range tests.”　这句话是在投稿说明里的，我现在还未投稿。

Guideline中的原文描述如下：
Material and Methods: the Materials and methods section should include full details of the statistical techniques used and authors are advised to refer to the article "Guidance for the use and presentation of statistics" in Weed Research (1988) 28, 139-144. This guide is to be updated shortly.   Preference is given to the presentation of standard errors of differences between means with appropriate degrees of freedom, rather than least significant differences in tables. Standard errors, etc., should be given to one more decimal place than the means to which they apply. Please do not use multiple range tests.

[ Last edited by ljq2008 on 2009-10-11 at 10:22 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼2009-10-10 19:50:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yanmin7813

铜虫 (著名写手)
★ ★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
ljq2008(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-11 10:01
我也正在关注.
回复此楼
2楼2009-10-10 20:17:52
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liujunhero

新虫 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献文献杰出贡献
★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
就是多重比较的意思啊
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2009-10-10 22:27:08
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tfj1123

木虫 (著名写手)
★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
呵呵，帮顶一个~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
4楼2009-10-10 23:14:27
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

球球棒棒

新虫 (正式写手)
★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
这个最好去专业版块咨询一下。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
5楼2009-10-11 00:33:04
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)
★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
帮顶！
回复此楼
6楼2009-10-11 06:46:10
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhuiuc

至尊木虫 (正式写手)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
SHY31(金币+5,VIP+0):谢谢积极回答，给予专家奖励 10-11 09:36
从wiki上摘录的，国内是不是wiki被屏蔽了？？另外，虫友门要善于用google等搜索工具，很多知识网上都有，实在不行再来问

Duncan's new multiple range test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In statistics, Duncan's new multiple range test (MRT) is a multiple comparison procedure developed by David B. Duncan in 1955. Duncan's MRT belongs to the general class of multiple comparison procedures that use the studentized range statistic qr to compare sets of means.

Duncan's new multiple range test (MRT) is a variant of the Student–Newman–Keuls method that uses increasing alpha levels to calculate the critical values in each step of the Newman–Keuls procedure. Duncan's MRT attempts to control family wise error rate (FWE) at αew = 1 − (1 − αpc)k−1 when comparing k, where k is the number of groups. This results in higher FWE than unmodified Newman–Keuls procedure which has FWE of αew = 1 − (1 − αpc)k/2.

David B. Duncan developed this test as a modification of the Student–Newman–Keuls method that would have greater power. Duncan's MRT is especially protective against false negative (Type II) error at the expense of having a greater risk of making false positive (Type I) errors. Duncan's test is commonly used in agronomy and other agricultural research.

Duncan's test has been criticised as being too liberal by many statisticians including Henry Scheffé, and John W. Tukey. Duncan argued that a more liberal procedure was appropriate because in real world practice the global null hypothesis H0= "All means are equal" is often false and thus traditional statisticians overprotect a probably false null hypothesis against type I errors. Duncan later developed the Duncan–Waller test which is based on Bayesian principles. It uses the obtained value of F to estimate the prior probability of the null hypothesis being true.

The main criticisms raised against Duncan's procedure are:

    * Duncan's MRT does not control family wise error rate at the nominal alpha level, a problem it inherits from Student–Newman–Keuls method.
    * The increased power of Duncan's MRT over Newman–Keuls comes from intentionally raising the alpha levels (Type I error rate) in each step of the Newman–Keuls procedure and not from any real improvement on the SNK method.

[ Last edited by jhuiuc on 2009-10-11 at 06:52 ]
赞一下(21人) 回复此楼
7楼2009-10-11 06:50:03
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

casper1852

银虫 (小有名气)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
cxksama(金币-49,VIP+0):在本版大量恶意灌水，重罚100金币！并永久禁止访问论文投稿综合版！备案参见：http://emuch.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1590231&page=1&sid=vQwa8Z#pid15834715 10-11 09:35
cxksama(金币-49,VIP+0):在本版大量恶意灌水，重罚！并永久禁止访问论文投稿综合版！备案参见：http://emuch.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1590231&page=1&sid=vQwa8Z#pid15834715 10-11 09:35
cxksama(金币-2,VIP+0):在本版大量恶意灌水，重罚！并永久禁止访问论文投稿综合版！备案参见：http://emuch.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1590231&page=1&sid=vQwa8Z#pid15834715 10-11 09:35
网上能查到联系方式
可是与对方联系的时候
赞一下(31人) 回复此楼
8楼2009-10-11 08:01:16
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

user66

木虫 (著名写手)
★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
cxksama(金币+0,VIP+0):提醒一下，你的IP与楼上的完全一致。且现已发现好几个帖子你们两个ID都是以楼上楼下的方式紧挨着接连出现。不论你们是一台电脑还是局域网，这种行为都有重大的马甲嫌疑。现发现的暂不处理，请以后注意！ 10-11 08:57
就是
多重比较
的意思
啊
赞一下(11人) 回复此楼
9楼2009-10-11 08:03:41
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

200311310

至尊木虫 (职业作家)
★
ljq2008(金币+1):谢谢参与
是不是说你的说法不够简练啊。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
10楼2009-10-11 09:50:02
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ljq2008 的主题更新
141/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭