24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3489)
>导师招生 (433)
>文献求助 (359)
>休闲灌水 (287)
>虫友互识 (129)
>考博 (121)
>招聘信息布告栏 (91)
>论文道贺祈福 (87)
>硕博家园 (83)
>论文投稿 (75)
>博后之家 (72)
>公派出国 (67)
>基金申请 (61)
>教师之家 (58)
>考研 (38)
>找工作 (33)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

910803339

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 32
散金: 20
帖子: 23
在线: 1.6小时
虫号: 34219755
注册: 2023-10-22
专业: 泌尿系统结石

[交流] sci大修审稿人的意见，录取概率多大？已有8人参与

Reviewer #1: A cross-sectional study that evaluates whether there is a positive association between BMI and kidney stone disease in diabetic population by using the NHANES data.
My comments are listed below:
1. Although the manuscript has been written in good English, there are still some spelling and punctuation errors (i.e., with Kidney stones..., Then We separated... , "with an older age" instead of "a larger age" on line 163, etc.) to be corrected.
2. The lines have been numbered, which facilitates to locate a comment, but it would be better if the pages are also numbered.
3. The abbreviations SII, PIR, BMI should be written openly when they are first used in the Abstract.
4. Line 148: It is not written how the patients have been divided into three groups according to their BMI values. Could you please give the cut-off values for each group?
5. Line 165: Does "triplets of age" mean grouped by three consecutive ages? If yes, I wonder why the authors have not used it as a continuous variable.
6. Lines 179-181: The authors mentioned that the correlation between BMI and kidney stones was much stronger in the study of Feng et al. (reference #11). However, they have concluded that the individuals with a BMI of greater than 30 were more strongly connected with kidney stone. Do the authors have an explanation for this? Moreover, the results of three-group interaction tests can be given in a separate table.
7. Maybe the subtitle "The association between BMI and kidney stones" can be changed as "Multivariate analysis of BMI and kidney stones" as the previous subtitle mentioned about the univariate analysis.
8. The tables have been located on separate pages which makes it difficult to read and have a general insight.

Reviewer #2: 1. The English language in this search should be revised specifically the link between phrases.
2. In this study, the author did not refer to the type of diabetes (type I or type II), as the pathogenesis and the treatment options are different, and the author did not mention the level of the blood sugar.
3. Abbreviations should be mentioned at the beginning of the text as many are not universal, such as PIR (poverty income rate)

发自小木虫IOS客户端

回复此楼