| 查看: 3086 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
sci大修审稿人的意见，录取概率多大？ 已有8人参与
|
|||
|
Reviewer #1: A cross-sectional study that evaluates whether there is a positive association between BMI and kidney stone disease in diabetic population by using the NHANES data. My comments are listed below: 1. Although the manuscript has been written in good English, there are still some spelling and punctuation errors (i.e., with Kidney stones..., Then We separated... , "with an older age" instead of "a larger age" on line 163, etc.) to be corrected. 2. The lines have been numbered, which facilitates to locate a comment, but it would be better if the pages are also numbered. 3. The abbreviations SII, PIR, BMI should be written openly when they are first used in the Abstract. 4. Line 148: It is not written how the patients have been divided into three groups according to their BMI values. Could you please give the cut-off values for each group? 5. Line 165: Does "triplets of age" mean grouped by three consecutive ages? If yes, I wonder why the authors have not used it as a continuous variable. 6. Lines 179-181: The authors mentioned that the correlation between BMI and kidney stones was much stronger in the study of Feng et al. (reference #11). However, they have concluded that the individuals with a BMI of greater than 30 were more strongly connected with kidney stone. Do the authors have an explanation for this? Moreover, the results of three-group interaction tests can be given in a separate table. 7. Maybe the subtitle "The association between BMI and kidney stones" can be changed as "Multivariate analysis of BMI and kidney stones" as the previous subtitle mentioned about the univariate analysis. 8. The tables have been located on separate pages which makes it difficult to read and have a general insight. Reviewer #2: 1. The English language in this search should be revised specifically the link between phrases. 2. In this study, the author did not refer to the type of diabetes (type I or type II), as the pathogenesis and the treatment options are different, and the author did not mention the level of the blood sugar. 3. Abbreviations should be mentioned at the beginning of the text as many are not universal, such as PIR (poverty income rate) 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
26申博自荐
已经有8人回复
-
接受26届调剂生
已经有15人回复
-
我尝试在小木虫上招计算机专业的调剂学生
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】
已经有4人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】
已经有3人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】
已经有3人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿山东大学105500药学专硕，总分302求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】
已经有5人回复
9楼2023-10-29 23:40:02
2楼2023-10-23 17:50:11
书虫1979
木虫 (正式写手)
超新星
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4346.3
- 散金: 1787
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 376
- 在线: 1236.9小时
- 虫号: 2256656
- 注册: 2013-01-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 星系和类星体
4楼2023-10-26 12:32:19
5楼2023-10-26 14:19:55
5