| ²é¿´: 1093 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßforget8013½«ÔùËÍÄú 100 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
forget8013ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£¡£¡Éó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄ¹ØÓÚ¼ì²âÏÞµÄÎÊÌ⣬²»ÖªµÀÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¬Çó°ïÖú¡£¡£¡£ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
I would encourage the author's to revisit the LOQ calculation as the signal is the height of the peak after background subtraction. While the calculation is correct, how do the authors define the standard deviation of the background since it was removed? Was error propagation performed in this case? The data in Fig 7 does not show the background, which would help convince the reader. Please be rigorous in the important LOQ estimate. ÎÒ×öµÄÊǵ绯ѧ·ÖÎö·½Ïò£¬ÔÚ×öÇúÏߵĹý³ÌÖÐÓÉÓÚµçÈݱ³¾°½Ï´ó£¬µ¼ÖÂDPVÇúÏß»ùÏß²»ÊÇÆ½µÄ£¬ËùÒÔÎÒ½«ÇúÏßµÄDPVÇúÏß¼õÈ¥Á˿հ׵ÄDPVÇúÏߣ¬¾ÍÊǿ۳ýÁ˱³¾°£¬µ«ÊÇÔÚ¼ÆËã¼ì³öÏ޺Ͷ¨Á¿ÏÞʱ£¬Éó¸åÈËÎÊÁËÕâÑùÒ»¸öÎÊÌ⣬˵ÎÒ¼ÈÈ»°Ñ±³¾°¿Û³ýÁËÎÒÔõôµÃµ½µÄ¿Õ°×Ðźŵıê׼ƫ²î£¬Í¬ÑùÈç¹ûÎÒÓÃÒ»¸ö¿Õ°×DPVÔÙ¿Û³ý±³¾°µÄ»°»á²»»áÓÖ½øÐÐÁËÎó²î´«²¥¡£ ȷʵ²»ÖªµÀÔõôÐÞ¸ÄÔõô»Ø¸´ÁË£¬Ï£ÍûÄܵõ½´ó¼ÒµÄ°ïÖú£¬²»Éõ¸Ðл£¡£¡£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
297£¬¹¤¿Æµ÷¼Á?ºÓÄÏũҵ´óѧ±¾¿Æ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
22ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
296Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬ÉúÎïѧ326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
22408 312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
26Äêµç³Ø·½Ïò²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0854µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
zhangy8627
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æÎÂůÎÒµÄÐÄ£¡
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 6488.3
- É¢½ð: 231
- Ìû×Ó: 1243
- ÔÚÏß: 353.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1019520
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-15
- רҵ: ÖÊÆ×·ÖÎö
2Â¥2023-07-20 12:27:26
Yinming98
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 29.5
- Ìû×Ó: 3
- ÔÚÏß: 3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 27627339
- ×¢²á: 2021-10-27
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
3Â¥2023-09-25 16:27:49













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥