24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

vava6

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 564.5
红花: 2
帖子: 247
在线: 38.2小时
虫号: 470040
注册: 2007-11-29
专业: 食品加工技术

[交流] 文章大修回来，向虫虫们求救

文章大修回来，向虫虫们求救

论文修改意见发回来了，好多还是不知道该怎么回复，向虫虫们求救！！！
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Editorial Office Chromatographia"<chromatographia@vieweg.de>;
Date:  Fri, Sep 25, 2009 10:55 PM
Chromatographia

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: The manuscript was well documented and organized. It may deserve publication in Chromatographia after revision although the English is not satisfactory.
Others:
5. Table 3. Equation of mutton kidney: the Y-intercept is too large, which means high background value.
不明白审稿人说的什么意思
6. The method should be applied to real samples, especially positive samples to validate.
不知道该如何回答，因为试验用样是从超市买的，都是阴性样

Reviewer #2:
In addition the validation of the LC-MS/MS method should deeply evaluate the presence or not of matrix effects for all the matrices investigated before to be applied to real samples (no internal standard is necessary??).
我们不用内标就做得不错呀
Introduction:
Experimental: there are some nonsense symbols (line 70, 88, 92, 101, 117, 127, 139, 145, 152). Please check the symbols and correct them.
说明：是“Ⅲ”和“℃”这两个符号在提交Manuscript自动生成PDF时无法正常显示，只是显示一个方框形状的符号。

Results and discussion
Considerations on samples preparation and liquid chromatography are nearly well done. The considerations on MS detection, limits, validation and recovery of the methods should be reorganized. It is not clear if the linearity was evaluated on matrix or on standard solution. In my opinion the use of an internal standard would have been useful since you consider many different matrices and the use of a labeled nanafrocin could be interesting to compare the results, even because you use different sample preparation depending on the different sample type.

Tables
Table 3. Did the Authors evaluate the significance of the intercepts?
不明白审稿人的意思

Figures
All figures are of poor quality.
所有的图片品质差，怎么样可以提高图片质量呢？

Fig. 2: you should indicate that these are chromatograms extracted following transition 301/257 for both the blank matrix (A) and the spiked sample (B). Do you have any idea why the retention times are slightly different?

Fig. 3: "Q1 full scan mass spectrum of nanafrocin" ....
Fig. 4: "Product-ion scan ion chromatogram of nanafrocin" not correct.
The figure represents the MS/MS fragmentation pattern of nanafrocin in ESI(-) acquired in a certain m/z range with a certain collisional energy. Please indicate the charge state on the fragments.

Comments by the Editorial Office on format and style:
- Figs: x-axis: Time (min) resp. m/z (amu)
不明白审稿人意思

Reviewer #1 recommends to shorten the ms to a Full Short Communication.
Prerequisites for a Full Short Communication:
The methodology described must be new for either the analyte(s) or the analyte-matrix combination; the advantages of the applied methodology over the already existing methods/procedures must be clear; the following topics must be described: method development,  validation and a relevant application and comparison of the described methodology with already existing methods/procedures and a description of a 'real-life'  application in detail (length less than 250 lines of text or 3,000 words in total. Figures and tables not more than a total of 4).
However, the final decision on publication and article type is always with the Editor.
我投稿时选择的是Article Type: Original，不想改为Full Short Communication

回复此楼