Znn3bq.jpeg
²é¿´: 262  |  »Ø¸´: 2
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£

vava6

Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

[½»Á÷] ÎÄÕ´óÐÞ»ØÀ´£¬Ïò³æ³æÃÇÇó¾È

ÎÄÕ´óÐÞ»ØÀ´£¬Ïò³æ³æÃÇÇó¾È

ÂÛÎÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û·¢»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ºÃ¶à»¹ÊDz»ÖªµÀ¸ÃÔõô»Ø¸´£¬Ïò³æ³æÃÇÇó¾È£¡£¡£¡
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Editorial Office Chromatographia"<chromatographia@vieweg.de>;
Date:  Fri, Sep 25, 2009 10:55 PM
Chromatographia

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: The manuscript was well documented and organized. It may deserve publication in Chromatographia after revision although the English is not satisfactory.
Others:
5. Table 3. Equation of mutton kidney: the Y-intercept is too large, which means high background value.
²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈË˵µÄʲôÒâ˼
6. The method should be applied to real samples, especially positive samples to validate.
²»ÖªµÀ¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ð£¬ÒòΪÊÔÑéÓÃÑùÊÇ´Ó³¬ÊÐÂòµÄ£¬¶¼ÊÇÒõÐÔÑù

Reviewer #2:
In addition the validation of the LC-MS/MS method should deeply evaluate the presence or not of matrix effects for all the matrices investigated before to be applied to real samples (no internal standard is necessary??).
ÎÒÃDz»ÓÃÄÚ±ê¾Í×öµÃ²»´íѽ
Introduction:
Experimental: there are some nonsense symbols (line 70, 88, 92, 101, 117, 127, 139, 145, 152). Please check the symbols and correct them.
˵Ã÷£ºÊÇ¡°¢ó¡±ºÍ¡°¡æ¡±ÕâÁ½¸ö·ûºÅÔÚÌá½»Manuscript×Ô¶¯Éú³ÉPDFʱÎÞ·¨Õý³£ÏÔʾ£¬Ö»ÊÇÏÔʾһ¸ö·½¿òÐÎ×´µÄ·ûºÅ¡£

Results and discussion
Considerations on samples preparation and liquid chromatography are nearly well done. The considerations on MS detection, limits, validation and recovery of the methods should be reorganized. It is not clear if the linearity was evaluated on matrix or on standard solution. In my opinion the use of an internal standard would have been useful since you consider many different matrices and the use of a labeled nanafrocin could be interesting to compare the results, even because you use different sample preparation depending on the different sample type.

Tables
   Table 3. Did the Authors evaluate the significance of the intercepts?
²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ˼

Figures
All figures are of poor quality.
ËùÓеÄͼƬƷÖʲÔõôÑù¿ÉÒÔÌá¸ßͼƬÖÊÁ¿ÄØ£¿

Fig. 2: you should indicate that these are chromatograms extracted following transition 301/257 for both the blank matrix (A) and the spiked sample (B). Do you have any idea why the retention times are slightly different?

Fig. 3: "Q1 full scan mass spectrum of nanafrocin" ....
Fig. 4: "Product-ion scan ion chromatogram of nanafrocin" not correct.
The figure represents the MS/MS fragmentation pattern of nanafrocin in ESI(-) acquired in a certain m/z range with a certain collisional energy. Please indicate the charge state on the fragments.

Comments by the Editorial Office on format and style:
- Figs: x-axis: Time (min) resp. m/z (amu)
²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈËÒâ˼

Reviewer #1 recommends to shorten the ms to a Full Short Communication.
Prerequisites for a Full Short Communication:
The methodology described must be new for either the analyte(s) or the analyte-matrix combination; the advantages of the applied methodology over the already existing methods/procedures must be clear; the following topics must be described: method development,  validation and a relevant application and comparison of the described methodology with already existing methods/procedures and a description of a 'real-life'  application in detail (length less than 250 lines of text or 3,000 words in total. Figures and tables not more than a total of 4).
However, the final decision on publication and article type is always with the Editor.
ÎÒͶ¸åʱѡÔñµÄÊÇArticle Type: Original£¬²»Ïë¸ÄΪFull Short Communication
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

vava6

Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

Çó¾È

ÕæµÄµÄÐèÒª´ó¼ÒµÄ°ïÖú
2Â¥2009-09-27 18:14:55
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

smilerobin

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)

²»¶®£¬ °ïÄã¶¥ÆðÀ´°É
3Â¥2009-09-27 19:30:51
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ vava6 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 346·Ö£¬¹¤¿Æ0854Çóµ÷¼Á£¬×¨Ë¶ +5 moser233 2026-04-12 5/250 2026-04-12 11:20 by 衳½³¾
[¿¼ÑÐ] 313Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Óà°Ú°ÚÊÇ´ó¸ç 2026-04-11 5/250 2026-04-12 10:34 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +11 ÔÂ@163.com 2026-04-07 13/650 2026-04-11 22:55 by BruceLiu320
[˶²©¼ÒÔ°] ÓÐûÓÐѧУ²ÄÁÏרҵÊÕ¿çµ÷(Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085410) +6 momo(Éϰ¶°æ) 2026-04-06 9/450 2026-04-11 22:38 by wj165256
[¿¼ÑÐ] 26×ÔÈ»µØÀíѧ303·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +6 Ò»Õ½³É˶°¡°¡°¡° 2026-04-06 11/550 2026-04-11 21:27 by Åáºêΰ
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯Ñ§308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +22 ÄãºÃÃ÷ÌìÄãºÃ 2026-04-07 24/1200 2026-04-11 11:14 by ChemPharm
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +6 archer.. 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-11 10:55 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¹¤¿Æ273µ÷¼Á +6 X1999 2026-04-09 7/350 2026-04-11 10:23 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á +26 ˶ÐǸ° 2026-04-09 27/1350 2026-04-10 22:24 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á288 +6 ioodiiij 2026-04-10 8/400 2026-04-10 21:07 by zhouxiaoyu
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖÐÄÏ´óѧÎïÀíѧ£¬Ó¢Ò»66£¬Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ³¤ÑÌì½ì» 2026-04-08 5/250 2026-04-10 10:31 by Ó±¹û¶ù
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷ÄÏ´óѧ348£¬TopÆÚ¿¯Ò»Çø¶þ×÷¡¢¶þÇøÈý×÷£¬ÈýµÈ½±Ñ§½ðÈý´Î +4 candyyyi 2026-04-09 4/200 2026-04-09 18:39 by l_paradox
[¿¼ÑÐ] 332£¬085601Çóµ÷¼Á +12 ydfyh 2026-04-09 14/700 2026-04-09 17:28 by wp06
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷ÄÏ´óѧÉúÎïѧѧ˶344 ÇóÉúÎïѧÏà¹Øµ÷¼Á/ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò© +7 ³¬È˲»»á·É@ 2026-04-08 7/350 2026-04-09 09:35 by gong120082
[¿¼ÑÐ] 328Çóµ÷¼Á +17 lftmya 2026-04-07 18/900 2026-04-09 08:05 by 5268321
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏʦ·¶´óѧ0702ÎïÀíѧ305µ÷¼Á +4 Äî³£°² 2026-04-07 6/300 2026-04-08 22:53 by bljnqdcc
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +13 Æâluck 2026-04-07 13/650 2026-04-08 22:46 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] 263·ÖBÇøÇóµ÷¼Á +6 Àînihao 2026-04-08 6/300 2026-04-08 09:38 by ÄÏ¿ªÐ¡ôë
[¿¼ÑÐ] 388Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ËÄ´¨ÍõÌÎ 2026-04-07 8/400 2026-04-08 00:17 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] 081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ´Þwj 2026-04-05 5/250 2026-04-06 15:40 by lin-da
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û