| ²é¿´: 262 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
vava6Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÎÄÕ´óÐÞ»ØÀ´£¬Ïò³æ³æÃÇÇó¾È
|
||
|
ÎÄÕ´óÐÞ»ØÀ´£¬Ïò³æ³æÃÇÇó¾È ÂÛÎÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û·¢»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ºÃ¶à»¹ÊDz»ÖªµÀ¸ÃÔõô»Ø¸´£¬Ïò³æ³æÃÇÇó¾È£¡£¡£¡ ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Editorial Office Chromatographia"<chromatographia@vieweg.de>; Date: Fri, Sep 25, 2009 10:55 PM Chromatographia Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The manuscript was well documented and organized. It may deserve publication in Chromatographia after revision although the English is not satisfactory. Others: 5. Table 3. Equation of mutton kidney: the Y-intercept is too large, which means high background value. ²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈË˵µÄʲôÒâ˼ 6. The method should be applied to real samples, especially positive samples to validate. ²»ÖªµÀ¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ð£¬ÒòΪÊÔÑéÓÃÑùÊÇ´Ó³¬ÊÐÂòµÄ£¬¶¼ÊÇÒõÐÔÑù Reviewer #2: In addition the validation of the LC-MS/MS method should deeply evaluate the presence or not of matrix effects for all the matrices investigated before to be applied to real samples (no internal standard is necessary??). ÎÒÃDz»ÓÃÄÚ±ê¾Í×öµÃ²»´íѽ Introduction: Experimental: there are some nonsense symbols (line 70, 88, 92, 101, 117, 127, 139, 145, 152). Please check the symbols and correct them. ˵Ã÷£ºÊÇ¡°¢ó¡±ºÍ¡°¡æ¡±ÕâÁ½¸ö·ûºÅÔÚÌá½»Manuscript×Ô¶¯Éú³ÉPDFʱÎÞ·¨Õý³£ÏÔʾ£¬Ö»ÊÇÏÔʾһ¸ö·½¿òÐÎ×´µÄ·ûºÅ¡£ Results and discussion Considerations on samples preparation and liquid chromatography are nearly well done. The considerations on MS detection, limits, validation and recovery of the methods should be reorganized. It is not clear if the linearity was evaluated on matrix or on standard solution. In my opinion the use of an internal standard would have been useful since you consider many different matrices and the use of a labeled nanafrocin could be interesting to compare the results, even because you use different sample preparation depending on the different sample type. Tables Table 3. Did the Authors evaluate the significance of the intercepts? ²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ˼ Figures All figures are of poor quality. ËùÓеÄͼƬƷÖʲÔõôÑù¿ÉÒÔÌá¸ßͼƬÖÊÁ¿ÄØ£¿ Fig. 2: you should indicate that these are chromatograms extracted following transition 301/257 for both the blank matrix (A) and the spiked sample (B). Do you have any idea why the retention times are slightly different? Fig. 3: "Q1 full scan mass spectrum of nanafrocin" .... Fig. 4: "Product-ion scan ion chromatogram of nanafrocin" not correct. The figure represents the MS/MS fragmentation pattern of nanafrocin in ESI(-) acquired in a certain m/z range with a certain collisional energy. Please indicate the charge state on the fragments. Comments by the Editorial Office on format and style: - Figs: x-axis: Time (min) resp. m/z (amu) ²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈËÒâ˼ Reviewer #1 recommends to shorten the ms to a Full Short Communication. Prerequisites for a Full Short Communication: The methodology described must be new for either the analyte(s) or the analyte-matrix combination; the advantages of the applied methodology over the already existing methods/procedures must be clear; the following topics must be described: method development, validation and a relevant application and comparison of the described methodology with already existing methods/procedures and a description of a 'real-life' application in detail (length less than 250 lines of text or 3,000 words in total. Figures and tables not more than a total of 4). However, the final decision on publication and article type is always with the Editor. ÎÒͶ¸åʱѡÔñµÄÊÇArticle Type: Original£¬²»Ïë¸ÄΪFull Short Communication |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
277Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
һ־Ը˫·Ç085400µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢344 Çóµ÷¼Á£¬¶Ô²ÄÁϺͻ¯Ñ§·½ÏòÒ²¸ÐÐËȤ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
279ѧ˶ʳƷרҵÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ʳƷÓëÓªÑø£¨0955£©271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
335Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
279Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
322Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
vava6
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 564.5
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 247
- ÔÚÏß: 38.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 470040
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-29
- רҵ: ʳƷ¼Ó¹¤¼¼Êõ
2Â¥2009-09-27 18:14:55
smilerobin
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 87 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 24710.3
- É¢½ð: 600
- ºì»¨: 44
- Ìû×Ó: 10734
- ÔÚÏß: 800.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 771843
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-16
- רҵ: ×ÔÈ»µØÀíѧ
3Â¥2009-09-27 19:30:51













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥