24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1087  |  回复: 6
当前主题已经存档。

jas910

[交流] 在高质量期刊上发表论文的十个要素

在高质量期刊上发表论文的十个要素

NO1. 下面是审稿人对某篇APL文章的评论
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized and Clear: Yes
Free From Errors: No
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: No
OVERALL RATING: Fair

NO.2 下面是审稿人对某篇JAP文章的评论
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS:
Reviewer Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Major Revision
Paper Interesting: No
Good Use of Space: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clearly Written: No
Spelling: Yes
Good Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Adequate References: No
Clear Figures: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Marginal

NO.3 下面是Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters期刊编辑
要求审稿人审稿时要考虑的几个要点:
Quality and significance of the Article                 
Clarity of Presentation                  
Suitability for Letters                  
Clarity of Figures and Tables (Is color essential?)                  
Understandable to Non-Specialists?               
Does Material Need to Be Added or Deleted?               
Recommendation                  
Do You Want to See the Revised Manuscript?

审稿人对Manuscript的最终审稿结果:      
Overall Rating: Reconsider based on responses to issues raised by reviewers
Good Scientific Quality: Yes
Appropriate Journal: Yes
Satisfactory English/References: No
Tables/Figures Adequate: No
Significance Level: 4
Significance Level Comment:
The author fabricated a good inductor on Si substrate with high Q-factor.
Appropriate Title and Abstract: Yes

NO.4 下面是两个审稿人对某篇会议文章的评论
Reviewer 1's opinion:
Appropriateness to the Conference: Strong Accept
Originality: Strong Accept
Technical Strength: Weak Accept
Presentation: Weak Accept
Overall Evaluation: Strong Accept
Reviewer 2's opinion:
Appropriateness to the Conference: Strong Accept
Originality: Weak Accept
Technical Strength: Weak Reject
Presentation: Weak Accept
Overall Evaluation: Marginal

NO5. 下面是三个审稿人对某篇ICIC会议文章的评论
REVIEW NO. 1
Originality: 2
Significance of topic: 3
Technical quality: 2
Relevance to ICIC 2006: 3
Presentation: 2
Overall rating: 2.4

REVIEW NO. 2
Originality: 4
Significance of topic: 3
Technical quality: 4
Relevance to ICIC 2006: 4
Presentation: 3
Overall rating: 3.6

REVIEW NO. 3
Originality: 4
Significance of topic: 4
Technical quality: 4
Relevance to ICIC 2006: 4
Presentation: 4
Overall rating: 4

NO.6 下面是三个审稿人对某篇文章的评论
Review from Reviewer 1
Originality : 3
Technical Correctness: 3
Impact: 3
Reference: 3
Presentation: 3
Relevance: 3
Overall Recommendation: 3
Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 6

Review from Reviewer 2
Originality: 7
Technical Correctness: 7
Impact: 7
Reference: 7
Presentation: 6
Relevance: 7
Overall Recommendation: 6
Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 6

Review from Reviewer 3
Originality : 6
Technical Correctness : 7
Impact: 6
Reference: 7
Presentation: 6
Relevance: 7
Overall Recommendation: 6
Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 5

对以上的总结:
在高质量期刊(含letters)上发表论文的十个要素
一:原创
二:创新
三:题目合适
四:好的摘要
五:论文组织论证严密(逻辑强)
六:图表清晰可靠
七:英语表达好,语法拼写等错误少
八:精选参考文献
九:LETTER要求投的文章要适合该期刊
十:可读,好的文章通俗易懂,有影响力
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangyb4142

金虫 (正式写手)

谢谢
很好
2楼2009-09-26 20:11:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2009-09-26 20:16:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这些似乎谁都知道。关键是如何做到。
4楼2009-09-26 20:23:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
5楼2009-09-26 22:19:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

glacier1123

金虫 (正式写手)

总结的很好啊
6楼2009-09-26 22:25:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hbqouc

木虫 (知名作家)

是的 题目 和摘要太重要了 我就有教训。。。
be somebody or nobody, the choice is yours
7楼2009-09-27 00:21:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jas910 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[公派出国] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 07:09 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 02:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-14 22:32 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +5 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 5/250 2026-08-14 18:48 by ssxclkj
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +6 majunge000 2026-08-11 8/400 2026-08-14 14:44 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键 +23 Lanmanbaby 2026-08-09 37/1850 2026-08-14 13:40 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] filecode +15 documentary 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-14 10:08 by kissu88
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +10 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 32/1600 2026-08-14 09:37 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 12/600 2026-08-13 23:20 by iwuli
[文学芳草园] 阿姨 +4 汪汪锅 2026-08-09 4/200 2026-08-13 19:43 by arzu_hma
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
信息提示
请填处理意见