24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jas910

应助: (幼儿园)
在线:
虫号: 848835

[交流] 在高质量期刊上发表论文的十个要素

在高质量期刊上发表论文的十个要素

NO1. 下面是审稿人对某篇APL文章的评论
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized and Clear: Yes
Free From Errors: No
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: No
OVERALL RATING: Fair

NO.2 下面是审稿人对某篇JAP文章的评论
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS：
Reviewer Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Major Revision
Paper Interesting: No
Good Use of Space: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clearly Written: No
Spelling: Yes
Good Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Adequate References: No
Clear Figures: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Marginal

NO.3 下面是Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters期刊编辑
要求审稿人审稿时要考虑的几个要点：
Quality and significance of the Article
Clarity of Presentation
Suitability for Letters
Clarity of Figures and Tables (Is color essential?)
Understandable to Non-Specialists?
Does Material Need to Be Added or Deleted?
Recommendation
Do You Want to See the Revised Manuscript?

审稿人对Manuscript的最终审稿结果：
Overall Rating: Reconsider based on responses to issues raised by reviewers
Good Scientific Quality: Yes
Appropriate Journal: Yes
Satisfactory English/References: No
Tables/Figures Adequate: No
Significance Level: 4
Significance Level Comment:
The author fabricated a good inductor on Si substrate with high Q-factor.
Appropriate Title and Abstract: Yes

NO.4 下面是两个审稿人对某篇会议文章的评论
Reviewer 1's opinion:
Appropriateness to the Conference: Strong Accept
Originality: Strong Accept
Technical Strength: Weak Accept
Presentation: Weak Accept
Overall Evaluation: Strong Accept
Reviewer 2's opinion:
Appropriateness to the Conference: Strong Accept
Originality: Weak Accept
Technical Strength: Weak Reject
Presentation: Weak Accept
Overall Evaluation: Marginal

NO5. 下面是三个审稿人对某篇ICIC会议文章的评论
REVIEW NO. 1
Originality: 2
Significance of topic: 3
Technical quality: 2
Relevance to ICIC 2006: 3
Presentation: 2
Overall rating: 2.4

REVIEW NO. 2
Originality: 4
Significance of topic: 3
Technical quality: 4
Relevance to ICIC 2006: 4
Presentation: 3
Overall rating: 3.6

REVIEW NO. 3
Originality: 4
Significance of topic: 4
Technical quality: 4
Relevance to ICIC 2006: 4
Presentation: 4
Overall rating: 4

NO.6 下面是三个审稿人对某篇文章的评论
Review from Reviewer 1
Originality : 3
Technical Correctness: 3
Impact: 3
Reference: 3
Presentation: 3
Relevance: 3
Overall Recommendation: 3
Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 6

Review from Reviewer 2
Originality: 7
Technical Correctness: 7
Impact: 7
Reference: 7
Presentation: 6
Relevance: 7
Overall Recommendation: 6
Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 6

Review from Reviewer 3
Originality : 6
Technical Correctness : 7
Impact: 6
Reference: 7
Presentation: 6
Relevance: 7
Overall Recommendation: 6
Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 5

对以上的总结：
在高质量期刊（含letters）上发表论文的十个要素
一：原创
二：创新
三：题目合适
四：好的摘要
五：论文组织论证严密（逻辑强）
六：图表清晰可靠
七：英语表达好，语法拼写等错误少
八：精选参考文献
九：LETTER要求投的文章要适合该期刊
十：可读，好的文章通俗易懂，有影响力

回复此楼