| 查看: 1074 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
在高质量期刊上发表论文的十个要素
|
|||
|
在高质量期刊上发表论文的十个要素 NO1. 下面是审稿人对某篇APL文章的评论 RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor) Paper Interesting: Yes Original Paper: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized and Clear: Yes Free From Errors: No Conclusions Supported: Yes Appropriate Title: No Good Abstract: Yes Satisfactory English: No Adequate References: Yes Clear Figures: No OVERALL RATING: Fair NO.2 下面是审稿人对某篇JAP文章的评论 JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS： Reviewer Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Major Revision Paper Interesting: No Good Use of Space: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized: Yes Clearly Written: No Spelling: Yes Good Title: No Good Abstract: Yes Adequate References: No Clear Figures: Yes TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal PRESENTATION RATING: Marginal NO.3 下面是Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters期刊编辑 要求审稿人审稿时要考虑的几个要点： Quality and significance of the Article Clarity of Presentation Suitability for Letters Clarity of Figures and Tables (Is color essential?) Understandable to Non-Specialists? Does Material Need to Be Added or Deleted? Recommendation Do You Want to See the Revised Manuscript? 审稿人对Manuscript的最终审稿结果： Overall Rating: Reconsider based on responses to issues raised by reviewers Good Scientific Quality: Yes Appropriate Journal: Yes Satisfactory English/References: No Tables/Figures Adequate: No Significance Level: 4 Significance Level Comment: The author fabricated a good inductor on Si substrate with high Q-factor. Appropriate Title and Abstract: Yes NO.4 下面是两个审稿人对某篇会议文章的评论 Reviewer 1's opinion: Appropriateness to the Conference: Strong Accept Originality: Strong Accept Technical Strength: Weak Accept Presentation: Weak Accept Overall Evaluation: Strong Accept Reviewer 2's opinion: Appropriateness to the Conference: Strong Accept Originality: Weak Accept Technical Strength: Weak Reject Presentation: Weak Accept Overall Evaluation: Marginal NO5. 下面是三个审稿人对某篇ICIC会议文章的评论 REVIEW NO. 1 Originality: 2 Significance of topic: 3 Technical quality: 2 Relevance to ICIC 2006: 3 Presentation: 2 Overall rating: 2.4 REVIEW NO. 2 Originality: 4 Significance of topic: 3 Technical quality: 4 Relevance to ICIC 2006: 4 Presentation: 3 Overall rating: 3.6 REVIEW NO. 3 Originality: 4 Significance of topic: 4 Technical quality: 4 Relevance to ICIC 2006: 4 Presentation: 4 Overall rating: 4 NO.6 下面是三个审稿人对某篇文章的评论 Review from Reviewer 1 Originality : 3 Technical Correctness: 3 Impact: 3 Reference: 3 Presentation: 3 Relevance: 3 Overall Recommendation: 3 Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 6 Review from Reviewer 2 Originality: 7 Technical Correctness: 7 Impact: 7 Reference: 7 Presentation: 6 Relevance: 7 Overall Recommendation: 6 Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 6 Review from Reviewer 3 Originality : 6 Technical Correctness : 7 Impact: 6 Reference: 7 Presentation: 6 Relevance: 7 Overall Recommendation: 6 Confidence in Overall Recommendation: 5 对以上的总结： 在高质量期刊（含letters）上发表论文的十个要素 一：原创 二：创新 三：题目合适 四：好的摘要 五：论文组织论证严密（逻辑强） 六：图表清晰可靠 七：英语表达好，语法拼写等错误少 八：精选参考文献 九：LETTER要求投的文章要适合该期刊 十：可读，好的文章通俗易懂，有影响力 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上项目filecode邪修
已经有6人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有14人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有4人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有22人回复
-
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有21人回复
-
filecode与中标关系的预测
已经有5人回复
-
fileCode有新解读？
已经有18人回复
-
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
hbqouc
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 38 (小学生)
- 金币: 3312.7
- 散金: 954
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 5269
- 在线: 235小时
- 虫号: 553345
- 注册: 2008-05-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋地质学
7楼2009-09-27 00:21:43
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2009-09-26 20:23:06
20