| ²é¿´: 778 | »Ø¸´: 11 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
09140208ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
revise Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´ÏºÃÂð£¿
|
||
|
±à¼Ð´ÁË·âÐÅÈçÏ£ºÇë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´ÏÂÊDz»ÊÇÖ»¸Ä¸ñʽ Dear ***, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Besides, please download the paper format instruction via the following link and revise your paper according to it (important). *** Your revision is due by 20-10-2009. Yours sincerely Reviewers' comments: I have now read the questions of the other reviewer and the replays, and also the replays to my own questions. I think that the authors have managed to answer my questions in a sound manner and also changed their manuscript according to my recommendations. I can therefore recommend the article to be published. [ Last edited by nxssw on 2009-10-5 at 15:35 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085802 323·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«Ë«·ÇԺУ¿¼ºË³¬¼¶ÎÞµ×Ïߣ¬Áìµ¼ÐÒÔÖÀÖ»ö£¬½ÌʦÔâÑê¿Ö
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
279ѧ˶ʳƷרҵÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²´óÉúÎïѧ07³õÊÔ322¡¢±¾¿Æ¶þ±¾¡¢µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Õã´óÉúÎï325·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤349·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
297¹¤¿Æ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á?
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ344Çóµ÷¼ÁË«·Ç¹¤¿ÆÑ§Ð£»ò¿ÎÌâ×é
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
yw__577
½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 360 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.058
- ½ð±Ò: 156.7
- É¢½ð: 25691
- ºì»¨: 30
- Ìû×Ó: 19956
- ÔÚÏß: 1856.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 762234
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-03
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
reply»¹ÊÇreplay°¡£¿ ÁíÍâÃ²ËÆ±à¼ÈÃÄãÐ޸ĸñʽ£¬Éó¸åÈËÒѾͬÒâ·¢±íÁË ¹§Ï²lz |
2Â¥2009-09-21 10:31:08
fanghuizhu
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 642.4
- Ìû×Ó: 1104
- ÔÚÏß: 2.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 843110
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-08
3Â¥2009-09-21 10:33:22
visa20083837
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4498.6
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 655
- ÔÚÏß: 1190.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 720916
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-12
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÁÙ´²ÉúÎﻯѧ¼ìÑé
4Â¥2009-09-21 10:40:50
pumaqwe
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 483.5
- Ìû×Ó: 120
- ÔÚÏß: 3.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 824230
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-08
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
¸Ð¾õ»¹Ã»µ½ÕâÒ»²½,·ûºÏ¿¯ÎïµÄ¸ñʽÊÇ×îÆðÂëµÄÒªÇó. |
5Â¥2009-09-21 10:48:49
liuhuihu08
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1738.8
- É¢½ð: 650
- Ìû×Ó: 185
- ÔÚÏß: 65.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 584669
- ×¢²á: 2008-08-01
- רҵ: úµØÖÊѧ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
ºÃÏóû¿´³öÀ´¡£²»¹ý¹§Ï²LZÎÄÕÂÊDz»²î²»¶àÒª½ÓÊÕÁË£¬µ«»¹µÃÐ޸ġ£ If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Õâ¾ä»°µÄÒâ˼ÊÇ£ºÈç¹û´òËã½øÐÐÐÞÕý£¬ÇëÌá½»ÐÞ¸ÄµÄ±íµ¥£¨ÄÇÀïÐ޸Ĺý£©»òÕßÌṩÕë¶ÔÿÌõÒâ¼ûµÄ·´²µ¡£Éó¸åÈËÓ¦¿ìÓÐÏêϸµÄÒâ¼ûµÄ£¬ÄãÒªÖðÌõÐ޸Ļò´ð¸´¡£ ÎÒÉÏһƪÂÛÎÄÈ˼ÒÉó¸åÈËÒ²ÌáÁËÆß¡¢°ËÌõÒâ¼û£¬ÓÐЩ¿ÉÒԸģ¬ÎÒ¾ÍÕë¶Ô¿ÉÒÔÐ޸ĵĽøÐÐÐ޸쬰üÀ¨²¹³äһЩ²ÄÁÏ¡£ÔÙ´ÎÌύʱ˵Ã÷ÁËÓÐЩ²»ÄÜÐ޸ĵĻòÕß²»ÐèÐ޸ĵÄÔÒò¡£ I have now read the questions of the other reviewer and the replays, and also the replays to my own questions. I think that the authors have managed to answer my questions in a sound manner and also changed their manuscript according to my recommendations. I can therefore recommend the article to be published. Õâ¾ä»°ºÜÏóÊDZ༵ϰ¡£¿´Ñù×ÓLZÒѾÈÏÕæÐ޸Ĺý¸å¼þ£¬¶øÇÒÂÛÎı»Õýʽ½ÓÊÕÁË¡£Ôٴι§Ï²LZ¡£ [ Last edited by liuhuihu08 on 2009-9-21 at 10:54 ] |
6Â¥2009-09-21 10:49:13
yw__577
½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 360 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.058
- ½ð±Ò: 156.7
- É¢½ð: 25691
- ºì»¨: 30
- Ìû×Ó: 19956
- ÔÚÏß: 1856.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 762234
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-03
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
I think that the authors have managed to answer my questions in a sound manner and also changed their manuscript according to my recommendations. I can therefore recommend the article to be published. lzÓ¦¸ÃÊÇÒѾ¸Ä¹ýÒ»´ÎÁ˰ɣ¬Õâ´ÎÊÇÔÚR1µÄ»ù´¡ÉÏÐÞ¸Ä |
7Â¥2009-09-21 10:54:46
09140208
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2076.3
- É¢½ð: 23
- Ìû×Ó: 119
- ÔÚÏß: 111.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 815869
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
|
Êǵ쬹ØÓÚÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÎÒÒÑÐ޸Ĺý£¬ÕâÊǵڶþ´Î±à¼Ð´µÄÐÅ¡£Ëû»¹ÓÐÒ»·âÐÅ˵³ýÁËÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û»¹ÓиñʽÎÊÌâÐèҪעÒâһϣ¬µ«Õâ´Î¾Íû¼ûÓÐÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û°¡¡£ Reviewers' comments: I have now read the questions of the other reviewer and the replays, and also the replays to my own questions. I think that the authors have managed to answer my questions in a sound manner and also changed their manuscript according to my recommendations. I can therefore recommend the article to be published. ÎÒÏëÉÏÃæµÄ»°Ò²ºÃÏóÊDZ༵ϰ¡£ÊÇÂð£¿ÊDz»ÊÇËû½¨Òé¸Ä¸ñʽºó·¢±í°¡ |
8Â¥2009-09-21 11:32:11
yiersaneryi
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2371.8
- Ìû×Ó: 529
- ÔÚÏß: 29.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 398934
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-11
- רҵ: ¹ÌÌåÎïÀí
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
Éó¸åÈËÒѾ¹ý¹ØÁË ¾Í¿´Ö÷±àµÄ×îºó¶¨¶áÁË£¬²»¹ý¿´ÆðÀ´ÒѾ׼½ÓÊÜÁË |
9Â¥2009-09-21 12:27:00
walker_204
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1129.4
- É¢½ð: 1025
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1207
- ÔÚÏß: 91Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 409467
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-22
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊô²ÄÁÏ
10Â¥2009-09-21 14:31:20













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥