| 查看: 1664 | 回复: 50 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 百搭鸡蛋酱 的 8 个金币 ，回帖就立即获得 2 个金币，每人有 1 次机会 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
回来还个愿 但也请大佬们给点意见 谢谢啦
|
|||
|
首先论文应该是接受了（有点激动），然后主编给发了邮件如下（大意是不能改动很多）： The comments of the reviewer(s) who reviewed your manuscript are included at the foot of this letter. We ask you to include any of the minor changes requested by the reviewer(s) (if any) before final upload of the paper. Please note, only minor editorial changes and small technical clarifications are permitted before the final upload. These changes may entail small changes to text (not to exceed a paragraph) or captions, or fine-tuning figures. However figures and text may not be removed from the paper after acceptance. IEEE performs a final similarity check between the accepted manuscript and the uploaded paper. If changes are determined to be too extensive, the paper will be sent out for re-review, which will delay publication. 可是审稿人2是这么说的： I commend the authors on the very thorough and detailed response to the reviewer comments. I am very pleased with the majority of the changes made. There are, however, some minor details that I would request the authors' address. In the current presentation, the reader is expected to jump between Figs 16 and 8, and 17 and 10 in order to be able to observe the validity. It is the responsibility of the authors to make understanding their argument as effortless as possible for the reader. A mention of using Fig. 8 for further comparisons on page 6 is not sufficient in my opinion. I strongly recommend that the authors find a way to incorporate the simulation results in Figs 16 and 17 alongside the experiment results. One suggestion is to use two y-axes in the figure to reconcile the different quantities (one axis for amplitude of simulated displacement and another for the amplitude of measured output voltage). 反正给的意见就是非要我把仿真图和试验图放在一起对比（我的仿真结果在第6页，试验结果在第10页，虽然我设置了超链接跳转，但是审稿人说这不利于读者的对比，他认为需要增强对比，然后建议我把试验结果和仿真结果画在一张图里面）。然后主要问题是：试验结果是误差棒的图，仿真图没有误差棒，两个放在一起对比，图例就很丑，，，，，作为一个深度强迫症，不知道咋整了，其实我个人认为超链接就很好用。。。谁知道是不是超链接经过投稿系统后失效了导致他审稿的时候很麻烦。。。 现在我想求助一下，有误差棒的试验曲线图和没有误差棒的仿真曲线图怎么放在一起...且由于种种原因，试验和仿真变量的单位也不一致，，，难受啊虫子们，求大佬帮忙。 顺便问一下，如果不按照审稿人说的改，会不会被编辑拒绝。或者说如果按照审稿人的改动太大，会不会又被重新送去审稿。。 大佬们 肿么办  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有6人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有17人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有6人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有19人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有16人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有21人回复
-
估计是周四
已经有4人回复
28楼2022-11-26 21:28:05
10楼2022-11-26 17:02:48
12楼2022-11-26 17:09:15
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2022-11-26 16:27
回复
百搭鸡蛋酱(金币+2): 谢谢参与
o 发自小木虫Android客户端
2022-11-26 16:29
回复
百搭鸡蛋酱(金币+2): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
烈日下的农民4楼
2022-11-26 16:30
回复
lele83655楼
2022-11-26 16:40
回复
林深见仙7楼
2022-11-26 16:47
回复
百搭鸡蛋酱(金币+2): 谢谢参与
up 发自小木虫Android客户端
6804168楼
2022-11-26 16:49
回复
2022lzd9楼
2022-11-26 16:55
回复
百搭鸡蛋酱(金币+2): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
bzmclj11楼
2022-11-26 17:02
回复
百搭鸡蛋酱(金币+2): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
XG-WUST13楼
2022-11-26 17:19
回复
百搭鸡蛋酱(金币+2): 谢谢参与
up 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2003228414楼
2022-11-26 17:23
回复
