24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (1667)
>虫友互识 (89)
>导师招生 (35)
>休闲灌水 (24)
>文献求助 (19)
>硕博家园 (16)
>考博 (16)
>考研 (13)
>论文投稿 (12)
>论文道贺祈福 (10)
>教师之家 (10)
>博后之家 (9)
>公派出国 (9)
>基金申请 (8)
>找工作 (8)
>金属 (2)

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者百搭鸡蛋酱的 8 个金币，回帖就立即获得 2 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

百搭鸡蛋酱

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 224.3
帖子: 1891
在线: 169.1小时
虫号: 19066382

[交流] 回来还个愿但也请大佬们给点意见谢谢啦

首先论文应该是接受了（有点激动），然后主编给发了邮件如下（大意是不能改动很多）：
The comments of the reviewer(s) who reviewed your manuscript are included at the foot of this letter. We ask you to include any of the minor changes requested by the reviewer(s) (if any) before final upload of the paper. Please note, only minor editorial changes and small technical clarifications are permitted before the final upload. These changes may entail small changes to text (not to exceed a paragraph) or captions, or fine-tuning figures. However figures and text may not be removed from the paper after acceptance. IEEE performs a final similarity check between the accepted manuscript and the uploaded paper. If changes are determined to be too extensive, the paper will be sent out for re-review, which will delay publication.
可是审稿人2是这么说的：
I commend the authors on the very thorough and detailed response to the reviewer comments. I am very pleased with the majority of the changes made. There are, however, some minor details that I would request the authors' address.

In the current presentation, the reader is expected to jump between Figs 16 and 8, and 17 and 10 in order to be able to observe the validity. It is the responsibility of the authors to make understanding their argument as effortless as possible for the reader. A mention of using Fig. 8 for further comparisons on page 6 is not sufficient in my opinion.

I strongly recommend that the authors find a way to incorporate the simulation results in Figs 16 and 17 alongside the experiment results. One suggestion is to use two y-axes in the figure to reconcile the different quantities (one axis for amplitude of simulated displacement and another for the amplitude of measured output voltage).

反正给的意见就是非要我把仿真图和试验图放在一起对比（我的仿真结果在第6页，试验结果在第10页，虽然我设置了超链接跳转，但是审稿人说这不利于读者的对比，他认为需要增强对比，然后建议我把试验结果和仿真结果画在一张图里面）。然后主要问题是：试验结果是误差棒的图，仿真图没有误差棒，两个放在一起对比，图例就很丑，，，，，作为一个深度强迫症，不知道咋整了，其实我个人认为超链接就很好用。。。谁知道是不是超链接经过投稿系统后失效了导致他审稿的时候很麻烦。。。
现在我想求助一下，有误差棒的试验曲线图和没有误差棒的仿真曲线图怎么放在一起...且由于种种原因，试验和仿真变量的单位也不一致，，，难受啊虫子们，求大佬帮忙。
顺便问一下，如果不按照审稿人说的改，会不会被编辑拒绝。或者说如果按照审稿人的改动太大，会不会又被重新送去审稿。。
大佬们肿么办