| ²é¿´: 1554 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
richfuľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
±à¼ÒªÇó½«Full Length Paper ¸ÄΪTechnical Note£¬ÎÒ¸ÃÔõô°ì£¿
|
||
|
Ͷ¸åComputer-Aided Design£¨ÔÚ¼ÆËã»ú¸¨ÖúÉè¼ÆÁìÓòËã¶¥¼¶ÆÚ¿¯£¬IF= 1.4£¬¹¤¿ÆËãºÜ¸ßÁË£©£¬Àúʱ°ëÄ꣬µÃµ½Ò»¸ömajor revision ½á¹û£¬±»Ò»¸öreviwer ½¨Ò齫Full Length Paper ¸ÄΪ technical note/short paper£¬ Õæ²»Öª¸ÃÔõô°ì¡£ ²»ÖªSCIÊÕ¼µÄʱºòÓÐûÓÐÇø±ð ¸½ EDITOR'S COMMENT: Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript in a major way requiring re-review. ¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ The over-all impression of the 3 referees about this paper is VERY NEGATIVE. Since it seems unlikely that this manuscript is accepted as a "Full Length Article", I recommend that the authors seriously consider the recommendation of referee-2 to resubmit this work as a "technical note/short paper". This Editor finds that referee-2's recommendation is quite fitting with the given three referee-reports. Reviewer #2: ¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ I believe that the paper can definitely be accepted as a technical note if that possibility exists. For this manuscript to be acceptable as a full paper, I feel that the scope of the solution must be a little wider or more general. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸0703»¯Ñ§ÕÐ61×îÖÕÅÅÃû62»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶294·Ö£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Ò»ÊýÒ»338·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
266µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
085801µçÆø×¨Ë¶272Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϿƴóÉúÎïѧ297·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
yw__577
½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 360 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.058
- ½ð±Ò: 156.7
- É¢½ð: 25691
- ºì»¨: 30
- Ìû×Ó: 19956
- ÔÚÏß: 1856.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 762234
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-03
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
full paper ºÍletter¶¼ÊdzÐÈϵģ¬letter¸üÓÐǰհÐÔ lz¼ÓÓÍ£¬Ó¦¸Ã¸ßÐ˲ÅÊÇ |
9Â¥2009-09-15 16:22:15
castep
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.061
- ½ð±Ò: 3371.7
- É¢½ð: 80
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1858
- ÔÚÏß: 796.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 181899
- ×¢²á: 2006-02-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§·´Ó¦¹¤³Ì
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
Ö»ÒªÄÜ·¢,³¤¶Ì¶ÔÓÚ±ÏÒµÆÀÖ°³ÆÊÇûӰÏìµÄ |

2Â¥2009-09-15 15:54:33
pauldli
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2817.7
- Ìû×Ó: 1111
- ÔÚÏß: 14.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 259680
- ×¢²á: 2006-06-17
- רҵ: Åäλ»¯Ñ§

3Â¥2009-09-15 15:56:46
wannerman
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 923.8
- É¢½ð: 1411
- Ìû×Ó: 298
- ÔÚÏß: 95.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 526008
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-16
- רҵ: Áã¼þ¼Ó¹¤ÖÆÔì
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| Õâ¸öºÜ¾³£³öÏֵģ¬ÎÒÃǵÄÒ»¸öͬѧ¾ÍÊÇÕâÑù£¬Ö÷ÒªÊÇÄãдµÄÄÚÈݱȽÏÐÂÓ±£¬¶øÇÒ°üº¬ÁËһЩÓмÛÖµµÄÐÅÏ¢¡£µ«ÊÇĿǰµÄ¹¤×÷»¹²»¹»ÍêÕûËùÒÔ¸øÄã¸ÄÁË¡£ÆäʵÒѾ˵Ã÷ÄãµÄÎÄÕ²»´íÁË£º£©¹§Ï²ÏÈ£¡ |

4Â¥2009-09-15 15:57:29













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥