| 查看: 1688 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
richfu木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
编辑要求将Full Length Paper 改为Technical Note，我该怎么办？
|
||
|
投稿Computer-Aided Design（在计算机辅助设计领域算顶级期刊，IF= 1.4，工科算很高了），历时半年，得到一个major revision 结果，被一个reviwer 建议将Full Length Paper 改为 technical note/short paper， 真不知该怎么办。 不知SCI收录的时候有没有区别 附 EDITOR'S COMMENT: Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript in a major way requiring re-review. 。。。。。。 The over-all impression of the 3 referees about this paper is VERY NEGATIVE. Since it seems unlikely that this manuscript is accepted as a "Full Length Article", I recommend that the authors seriously consider the recommendation of referee-2 to resubmit this work as a "technical note/short paper". This Editor finds that referee-2's recommendation is quite fitting with the given three referee-reports. Reviewer #2: 。。。。。 I believe that the paper can definitely be accepted as a technical note if that possibility exists. For this manuscript to be acceptable as a full paper, I feel that the scope of the solution must be a little wider or more general. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
十年后又回来了，论文投稿求助
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
fileCode有新解读？
已经有17人回复
-
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
5楼2009-09-15 15:57:31
castep
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.061
- 金币: 3371.7
- 散金: 80
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1858
- 在线: 796.1小时
- 虫号: 181899
- 注册: 2006-02-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化学反应工程
2楼2009-09-15 15:54:33
3楼2009-09-15 15:56:46
wannerman
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 923.8
- 散金: 1411
- 帖子: 298
- 在线: 95.3小时
- 虫号: 526008
- 注册: 2008-03-16
- 专业: 零件加工制造
4楼2009-09-15 15:57:29
100