24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2323  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者是个好影迷将赠送您 5 个金币

是个好影迷

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 请问elsevier这个revise-language状态是需要大修吗? 已有3人参与

投了一个三区文章现在第二次大修的意见返回View Decision的状态是revise-language,但是给了两个月。
编辑的意见是:
Reviewer comments on your manuscript indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, I invite you to submit a revised version of your manuscript if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments included below.

If you submit a revised manuscript, please consider the reviewer's comments carefully. Please resubmit your manuscript by Nov 28, 2022.

然后直接贴了两个评审的评分表给我:

1. Are the objectives and the rationale of the study clearly stated?


Reviewer #1: The objectives and the rationale are clearly described.

Reviewer #3: 1、well stated

--------------------

2. If applicable, is the application/theory/method/study reported in sufficient detail to allow for its replicability and/or reproducibility?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

3. If applicable, are statistical analyses, controls, sampling mechanism, and statistical reporting (e.g., P-values, CIs, effect sizes) appropriate and well described?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

4. Could the manuscript benefit from additional tables or figures, or from improving or removing (some of the) existing ones?

Please provide specific suggestions for improvements, removals, or additions of figures or tables. Please number each suggestion so that author(s) can more easily respond.

Reviewer #1: Tables and figures are fine.

Reviewer #3: the results had been well stated.

--------------------

5. If applicable, are the interpretation of results and study conclusions supported by the data?


Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [] No [] N/A [X]
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

6. Have the authors clearly emphasized the strengths of their study/theory/methods/argument?

Reviewer #1: They clearly described their strength of the study,

Reviewer #3: No.
highlights had not been well emphasized.

--------------------

7. Have the authors clearly stated the limitations of their study/theory/methods/argument?


Reviewer #1: Yes, they clearly mentioned the limitation.

Reviewer #3: 1. should be further analyzed in this research.

--------------------

8. Does the manuscript structure, flow or writing need improving (e.g., the addition of subheadings, shortening of text, reorganization of sections, or moving details from one section to another)?

Reviewer #1: The structure of the paper is fine,

Reviewer #3: 1. The logical meaning of some sentence are confusing,;
such as "Hence, .... efficiency and usability."
2. there were a fair amount of grammatical errors found in this manuscript.

--------------------

9. Could the manuscript benefit from language editing?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

主要是评审3提了①highlight写得不够好,②结果需要进一步分析,③提了一个语法问题但认为文章需要润色

其实我二审已经润色过了,并且附上了elsevier的语言编辑证书,评审1觉得语言没问题,评审3觉得有问题

关键编辑这句it is not acceptable for publication in its present form是套话还是委婉的拒稿.....
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cyh_crl

银虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:08:33
it is not acceptable for publication in its present form
这句话只是说明你的论文需要修改,并且几乎是最流行的返修模板
2楼2022-09-30 17:18:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风筝不想飞呀

木虫之王 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+1, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:19
楼主的情况并非直接拒稿,顶多算是拒稿重投。既然编辑给了修改机会,就好好按照审稿意见修改,尤其是审稿人3,还是有希望的,祝好运。
成王败寇
3楼2022-09-30 20:03:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:09
按审稿人3的意见再修改一下,看上去主要是语言的改进。
4楼2022-09-30 20:56:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 是个好影迷 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 接受26届调剂生 +13 猪猪猪毛 2026-03-06 13/650 2026-03-07 02:35 by loadinggg
[考博] 售渎SCI文章,我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】 +4 ipys00zm58 2026-03-06 6/300 2026-03-07 00:30 by vwchyxxzm4
[考研] 诚求调剂,323分 有专利/科研/实习经历 +5 橙子cyx 2026-03-06 6/300 2026-03-06 20:05 by wangjihu
[考研] 复试调剂 +7 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-05 10/500 2026-03-06 16:07 by @飒飒飒飒
[考研] 材料专硕调剂 +4 慕辰123 2026-03-05 7/350 2026-03-06 10:22 by 慕辰123
[考研] 334求调剂 +6 Trying] 2026-03-05 8/400 2026-03-06 00:16 by wutongshun
[考研] 求材料调剂 +4 berdmond 2026-03-05 4/200 2026-03-05 19:45 by 黑衣馒头人
[考研] 材料学学硕308分/本科东北大学/一志愿西北工业大学/ 5+3 苏尧幺幺 2026-03-03 8/400 2026-03-05 16:06 by njzyff
[考研] 环境工程专硕307 一志愿211 四六级已过 求调剂 +5 ccc! 2026-03-03 6/300 2026-03-05 09:42 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 267调剂求助 +5 聪少OZ 2026-03-04 5/250 2026-03-05 09:38 by kakakapanpan
[考研] 一志愿武汉理工大学-085602-总分296分-求调剂 +7 紫川葡柚 2026-03-04 7/350 2026-03-04 21:04 by kakakapanpan
[考研] 085601 材料305分求助 +4 泡泡邮件 2026-03-03 6/300 2026-03-04 13:00 by 无际的草原
[考研] 291求调剂 +3 咕噜咕噜123123 2026-03-02 4/200 2026-03-04 08:39 by 每天只摆一小会
[考研] 290求调剂 +9 ErMiao1020 2026-03-02 9/450 2026-03-03 18:03 by linlonghao
[考研] 268求调剂 +10 简单点0 2026-03-02 14/700 2026-03-03 14:51 by pingping55
[考研] 267求调剂 +6 钓鱼佬as 2026-03-02 6/300 2026-03-03 13:59 by 13589
[考研] 265分求调剂不调专业和学校有行学上就 +6 礼堂丁真258 2026-02-28 9/450 2026-03-02 12:04 by 52hz~~
[考研] 哈工大计算机刘劼团队招生 +4 hit_aiot 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-02 11:53 by 一声问好
[考研] 275求调剂 +3 L-xin? 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-02 10:22 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 291分工科求调剂 +9 science饿饿 2026-03-01 10/500 2026-03-01 18:55 by 18137688336
信息提示
请填处理意见