| 查看: 768 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者cuc丨koo将赠送您 10 个金币 | |||
cuc丨koo新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
求助|各位老师帮帮忙，有一条审稿意见不懂
|
||
|
RCT：两种神经阻滞对术后恢复质量（QoR）-15评分的影响，数据是偏态分布，使用秩和检验比较了两组术后24h和48h的QoR-15评分，审稿人提出了以下意见，希望各位老师帮忙看看是什么意思，谢谢各位老师了。 2)The values of QoR-15 were serially compared between the two groups over time. It induces alpha-inflation and caution is required in interpreting the results. The results presented by the authors do not seem to take this into account. Statistical verification is required. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有19人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复