| 查看: 850 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
pjm013236木虫 (正式写手)
是牛不是牛人
|
[交流]
Analytical Letters审稿意见
|
||
|
I have reviewed your manuscript above which you submitted to Analytical Letters. I regret to inform you that reports of routine chromatographic analyses are not suitable for publication in the journal without particularly compelling reasons. I therefore cannot consider your manuscript for publication without compelling evidence. Examples might include the use of a method for a significant application, or the absence of other suitable methods of analysis for an analyte. This manuscript did not include such evidence, and hence it cannot be considered for publication. I encourage you to revise the manuscript so that it meets these criteria, and consider resubmission to Analytical Letters. Thank you for considering Analytical Letters. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. 大家帮忙看看，还有戏吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
复试调剂
已经有21人回复
-
求调剂学校
已经有13人回复
-
291 求调剂
已经有39人回复
-
271求调剂
已经有30人回复
-
材料类284调剂
已经有50人回复
-
291分调剂
已经有9人回复
-
调剂求收留
已经有34人回复
-
22408 312求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
290调剂生物0860
已经有41人回复
匿名
用户注销 (著名写手)
- 应助: 62 (初中生)
- 金币: 1738.8
- 散金: 6488
- 红花: 33
- 帖子: 1494
- 在线: 698.1小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2008-03-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 生物无机化学
6楼2009-09-09 10:15:29
2楼2009-09-09 09:25:14
3楼2009-09-09 09:39:17
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2009-09-09 09:52:10
