| 查看: 941 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
pjm013236木虫 (正式写手)
是牛不是牛人
|
[交流]
Analytical Letters审稿意见
|
||
|
I have reviewed your manuscript above which you submitted to Analytical Letters. I regret to inform you that reports of routine chromatographic analyses are not suitable for publication in the journal without particularly compelling reasons. I therefore cannot consider your manuscript for publication without compelling evidence. Examples might include the use of a method for a significant application, or the absence of other suitable methods of analysis for an analyte. This manuscript did not include such evidence, and hence it cannot be considered for publication. I encourage you to revise the manuscript so that it meets these criteria, and consider resubmission to Analytical Letters. Thank you for considering Analytical Letters. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. 大家帮忙看看，还有戏吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上项目filecode邪修
已经有6人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有14人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有4人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有22人回复
-
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有21人回复
-
filecode与中标关系的预测
已经有5人回复
-
fileCode有新解读？
已经有18人回复
-
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2009-09-09 09:52:10
2楼2009-09-09 09:25:14
3楼2009-09-09 09:39:17
wanggongke
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5995.6
- 散金: 1016
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 737
- 在线: 117.5小时
- 虫号: 617917
- 注册: 2008-10-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
5楼2009-09-09 09:59:08
20