| 查看: 6969 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 nmgmts 的 48 个金币 ，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ACS Applied Energy Materials 现在是二区还是三区啊？审稿人给出 Top 20%的评价
|
|||
|
最近投了一篇文章，一开始投的ACS NaNo,被拒了。让转投ACS Applied Energy Materials。就转了过去，审稿很快就回来了。审稿人一共2个，给的评价比较正面。两个审稿人都评价是论文在TOP20%里面，我感觉挺意外的。这个期刊是不是很水啊？我感觉我的文章很一般，居然评价这么高。这个期刊现在是二区还是三区啊？对评职称有用吗？ 第一个审稿人评语： Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 I strongly recommend acceptance of the article for publication in ACS Applied Energy Materials after minor corrections. Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions noted. Comments: see attached file Additional Questions: Is this paper in the top 20% of manuscripts in the field?: Yes If this paper is not in the top 20% of manuscripts in the field: Is it appealing to the topical audience for this journal?: Yes Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes Are the literature references appropriate and up to date?: No Provides significant insight into or the development of an important application: Good Work is original and significant: Good Conclusions adequately supported by data: Good Clarity of presentation: Good Potential for impact in energy materials science and engineering: Good 第二个审稿人： Additional Questions: Is this paper in the top 20% of manuscripts in the field?: Yes If this paper is not in the top 20% of manuscripts in the field: Is it appealing to the topical audience for this journal?: Yes Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes Are the literature references appropriate and up to date?: Yes Provides significant insight into or the development of an important application: Good Work is original and significant: Good Conclusions adequately supported by data: Good Clarity of presentation: Good Potential for impact in energy materials science and engineering: Good |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
★
nmgmts(金币+1): 谢谢参与
nmgmts(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
8楼2022-05-09 11:15:23
2楼2022-05-09 09:43:45
3楼2022-05-09 09:44:17
4楼2022-05-09 09:45:56
简单回复
zhangdigua13楼
2022-05-10 22:31
回复
nmgmts(金币+1): 谢谢参与
l 发自小木虫IOS客户端
tzynew6楼
2022-05-09 09:53
回复
nmgmts(金币+1): 谢谢参与
i 发自小木虫Android客户端
30