| 查看: 2260 | 回复: 4 | ||
[求助]
投过Frontiers杂志的老师，请指点迷津 已有1人参与
|
|
投了一篇Case,审稿意见回来了，让大修；审稿人除了提出审稿意见以外，还做了以下评价，请问以下这种评价需要逐一回复吗？是否需要根据这个评价来修改文章，还是说只需要管审稿人提出的审稿意见就行呢？ Check List a. Is the quality of the figures and tables satisfactory? No b. Is the case study presented in an appropriate context with satisfactory reference to the relevant literature? Yes c. Is the following information included and presented with clarity: a) de-identified demographic and other patient information; b)main concerns and symptoms of the patient; c) medical, family, and psychosocial history including genetic information; d) relevant past interventions and their outcomes? No d. Is the case presented in enough detail with reference to all relevant physical examination (PE) and other clinical findings? Yes e. Is there a figure or table showcasing a timeline with relevant data from the episode of care? No |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
3,4-二羟基苯乙酮如何纯化？
已经有3人回复
-
国基评审
已经有10人回复
-
析晶
已经有5人回复
-
国自然面上和省基金B类撒花
已经有22人回复
-
2026-博士申请
已经有4人回复
-
26级硕士毕业生求博导收留
已经有4人回复
-
湖南大学刘巧玲课题组2026年第二批次博士研究生招生信息
已经有6人回复
-
考研调剂
已经有3人回复
-
急招9月入学博士，要有4级、最晚7月硕士毕业。精密电机驱控课题；学位材料
已经有5人回复
-
又一批高校组建人工智能学院 师资行吗 不是骗人吗
已经有7人回复
2楼2022-04-22 22:48:16
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
292227423: 金币+30, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-04-25 22:11:35
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
292227423: 金币+30, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-04-25 22:11:35
|
下面的打分不需要太在意，我的也是有一个“no”。要frontiers接收，必须外审同意。态度好一点修改。 a. Is the quality of the figures and tables satisfactory? - No b. Does the reference list cover the relevant literature adequately and in an unbiased manner? - Yes c. Are the statistical methods valid and correctly applied? (e.g. sample size, choice of test) - Yes d. Is a statistician required to evaluate this study? - Yes e. Are the methods sufficiently documented to allow replication studies? - Yes |
3楼2022-04-25 20:19:56
4楼2022-06-17 19:54:06
chaos_viyoo
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 27.4
- 帖子: 18
- 在线: 4.8小时
- 虫号: 4194597
- 注册: 2015-11-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 医学光子学、光谱与光学成
5楼2022-06-22 19:34:38