| 查看: 2305 | 回复: 4 | ||
[求助]
投过Frontiers杂志的老师，请指点迷津 已有1人参与
|
|
投了一篇Case,审稿意见回来了，让大修；审稿人除了提出审稿意见以外，还做了以下评价，请问以下这种评价需要逐一回复吗？是否需要根据这个评价来修改文章，还是说只需要管审稿人提出的审稿意见就行呢？ Check List a. Is the quality of the figures and tables satisfactory? No b. Is the case study presented in an appropriate context with satisfactory reference to the relevant literature? Yes c. Is the following information included and presented with clarity: a) de-identified demographic and other patient information; b)main concerns and symptoms of the patient; c) medical, family, and psychosocial history including genetic information; d) relevant past interventions and their outcomes? No d. Is the case presented in enough detail with reference to all relevant physical examination (PE) and other clinical findings? Yes e. Is there a figure or table showcasing a timeline with relevant data from the episode of care? No |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
河北省自然科学基金
已经有5人回复
-
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有24人回复
-
献血感触
已经有13人回复
-
面上本子正文33页，违规吗？会被低分嘛？
已经有16人回复
-
国自然评分
已经有5人回复
-
国自然上会要求
已经有11人回复
-
投稿求助，期刊
已经有6人回复
-
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有10人回复
-
评审有感
已经有26人回复
-
Sci. Bull. 悲剧经验
已经有8人回复
2楼2022-04-22 22:48:16
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
292227423: 金币+30, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-04-25 22:11:35
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
292227423: 金币+30, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-04-25 22:11:35
|
下面的打分不需要太在意，我的也是有一个“no”。要frontiers接收，必须外审同意。态度好一点修改。 a. Is the quality of the figures and tables satisfactory? - No b. Does the reference list cover the relevant literature adequately and in an unbiased manner? - Yes c. Are the statistical methods valid and correctly applied? (e.g. sample size, choice of test) - Yes d. Is a statistician required to evaluate this study? - Yes e. Are the methods sufficiently documented to allow replication studies? - Yes |
3楼2022-04-25 20:19:56
4楼2022-06-17 19:54:06
chaos_viyoo
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 27.4
- 帖子: 18
- 在线: 4.8小时
- 虫号: 4194597
- 注册: 2015-11-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 医学光子学、光谱与光学成
5楼2022-06-22 19:34:38
5