| 查看: 1265 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 zzhz229889 的 15 个金币 | |||
zzhz229889新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
拒稿重投
|
||
|
论文拒稿重投,重投快两月了,还在外审,成功率大吗,一轮的时侯审稿人1:拒稿,但问的都是实验过程问题,没涉及创新点的问题。审稿人2模型有趣但有局限性,提了个模型问题,其他都是格式。审稿人3都是格式问题 拒信附上 Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed the peer-review process for possible publication in ASCE's International Journal of Geomechanics. After several revisions, the editor's final decision was to decline the manuscript with encouragement to resubmit. For your guidance, you will find below the reviewer's comments identifying those elements of the manuscript that prevent its acceptance by the Journal. We realize that it takes a great deal of time and effort to prepare a paper for submission and we thank you for choosing the International Journal of Geomechanics for submission of your work. If you choose to resubmit, the manuscript will receive a new manuscript number and be treated as a new submission to the journal. Sincerely, Monica Leigh Editorial Coordinator Reviewers' comments: Dear Authors, enclosed please find the Assessment of your paper. The Reviewers and the AE raise significant arguments against the publication. Based on this, the paper cannot be accepted for publication in the present form. I hope this will not discourage you to submit papers to IJoG in the future. If you think you can overcome the critical limitations raised, You could consider submitting your work as a new manuscript. In this case please mention the fact that the paper was submitted and revised before (including its previous number) and please also add your point of view on the previous review process in the ‘additional information’ section. Alternatively, you may consider submitting your paper to another journal. Very kind regards AE: The content is interesting to the readers of IJoG. However, the three reviewers provide critical comments on the experimental methods and constitutive model. In additional, the writing should also be carefully polished. 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
» 猜你喜欢
什么是人一生最重要的?
已经有7人回复
版面费该交吗
已经有17人回复
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层,如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有19人回复
【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士
已经有8人回复
280求调剂
已经有4人回复
面上可以超过30页吧?
已经有12人回复
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊,但还是做不出宇树机器人?
已经有11人回复
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多,主要哪些原因引起的?
已经有9人回复
mxnjfu
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9890.9
- 散金: 3500
- 红花: 80
- 帖子: 7985
- 在线: 257.1小时
- 虫号: 471628
- 注册: 2007-12-02
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2022-04-09 01:07:54
leonard187
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 33 (小学生)
- 金币: 5620.9
- 散金: 6
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1268
- 在线: 466.8小时
- 虫号: 549170
- 注册: 2008-04-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 天然药物化学

3楼2022-04-09 09:06:57
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2022-04-09 09:17:00
5楼2022-04-09 09:52:26
风筝不想飞呀
木虫之王 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 651 (博士)
- 金币: 70731.8
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 59
- 帖子: 13610
- 在线: 742.2小时
- 虫号: 7065795
- 注册: 2017-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁场与波

6楼2022-04-10 09:18:23
revo1ution
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 633.1
- 散金: 21
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 183
- 在线: 23.1小时
- 虫号: 7492465
- 注册: 2017-11-19
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
问题不大,好好修改,可能编辑找了第四个审稿人,我之前的文章也是拒稿重投,之前拒搞的审稿人依然拒搞,然后编辑找了第四个审稿人,小修中。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
7楼2022-04-10 10:07:54
zzhz229889
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 141.1
- 散金: 91
- 帖子: 87
- 在线: 49.4小时
- 虫号: 29439248
- 注册: 2022-04-07
- 专业: 岩土与基础工程
8楼2022-04-12 22:15:24













回复此楼