| 查看: 1407 | 回复: 3 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
zhuolin110铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
请问APL投稿审稿人意见能相差这么大吗？已有1人参与
|
||||
|
reviewer comments: reviewer #1 evaluations: does this paper meet apl's standards: no is the paper scientifically sound with the assertions made and conclusions drawn well supported: no is the discussion of related work and associated references adequate?: no is the english satisfactory?: no is the title short, interesting, and descriptive of the contents?: no is the paper well organized and understandable?: no reviewer #2 evaluations: does this paper meet apl's standards: yes is the paper scientifically sound with the assertions made and conclusions drawn well supported: yes is the discussion of related work and associated references adequate?: yes is the english satisfactory?: yes is the title short, interesting, and descriptive of the contents?: yes is the paper well organized and understandable?: yes 两个审稿人意见能相差这么大吗？ 审稿人1我怀疑都没看文章啊，不是一个领域的怎么办？ 被拒了能重投吗？ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Appl Phys Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有15人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有6人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有15人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有11人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有16人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
zhuolin110
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 195.2
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 94
- 在线: 27.7小时
- 虫号: 2599231
- 注册: 2013-08-15
- 专业: 半导体电子器件
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555210
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会