| 查看: 1458 | 回复: 3 | ||||
zhuolin110铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
请问APL投稿审稿人意见能相差这么大吗？ 已有1人参与
|
|
reviewer comments: reviewer #1 evaluations: does this paper meet apl's standards: no is the paper scientifically sound with the assertions made and conclusions drawn well supported: no is the discussion of related work and associated references adequate?: no is the english satisfactory?: no is the title short, interesting, and descriptive of the contents?: no is the paper well organized and understandable?: no reviewer #2 evaluations: does this paper meet apl's standards: yes is the paper scientifically sound with the assertions made and conclusions drawn well supported: yes is the discussion of related work and associated references adequate?: yes is the english satisfactory?: yes is the title short, interesting, and descriptive of the contents?: yes is the paper well organized and understandable?: yes 两个审稿人意见能相差这么大吗？ 审稿人1我怀疑都没看文章啊，不是一个领域的怎么办？ 被拒了能重投吗？ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Appl Phys Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有10人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555220
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhuolin110: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-01-26 15:22:52
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhuolin110: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-01-26 15:22:52
|
审稿意见相左并不罕见。如果不服，可以申诉，但成功率不高。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
2楼2022-01-26 07:33:03
zhuolin110
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 195.2
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 94
- 在线: 27.7小时
- 虫号: 2599231
- 注册: 2013-08-15
- 专业: 半导体电子器件
3楼2022-01-26 15:23:31
4楼2022-06-16 15:36:24