| 查看: 172 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
yinhuanshun至尊木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
审稿意见不明白
|
||
|
投Food Chemistry “with editor” 状态一个月 没有经过 “under reviewed” 今天就变成 “Major revision and reconsideration” 意见如下： Your manuscript has failed an initial evaluation for the erason below. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely, Pul M. Finlas Receiving Editor Food Chemistry Reviewers' comments: You obviously have not carefully read the Guide for Authors as the total combined number of tables and figures must not exceed six. 请问这样回信是否说明已经送审了，而且审稿意见回来了？ 我个人认为应该没有送审。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有9人回复
-
救命帖
已经有5人回复
-
限项规定
已经有5人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
-
招博士
已经有3人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有35人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
-
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
-
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
realmadrider
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6452.3
- 帖子: 1174
- 在线: 167.9小时
- 虫号: 480981
- 注册: 2007-12-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
2楼2009-08-24 14:00:40