| 查看: 993 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者linzhiqi1将赠送您 100 个金币 | ||
linzhiqi1木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
请教审稿意见的读解
|
|
|
Editor's Comments: As you will see from the comments of the referee, this manuscript is not deemed appropriate as Little Gems column article. The referee does indicate that it has promise as a regular article, but only after improvements have been made with regard to the grammar and language; my own thoughts are in line with this assessment, but I am not comfortable sending this version out for further expert external review as a regular article until it has been completely revised and improvements in the language have been made. (As an example of where improvements are necessary, the first two sentences suffer from grammar problems, so much so that they are difficult to interpret.) Furthermore, the most recent citation in your manuscript is from 2002; several Arduino based papers have appeared in the literature since then, at least one of which is likely to be relevant, so your manuscript should be rewritten after studying that literature. Finally, it would be useful to see more detail about how you use this in your own class or lab setting, and to see a sample of the data over a range of depths of water (or perhaps other fluids) so that others can assess whether they want to invest energy in mimicking your setup, so please consider how you might include those ideas in your revised manuscript also. Should you wish to pursue publication of this work in TPT further, then it will be important to revise your manuscript along the lines suggested above; I will then strive to find suitable expert reviewers to further assess your submission. Thank you for your consideration. **************** Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: The paper contributes to the teaching of introductory physics.: Yes The material is correct as written.: Yes The material is novel (not common knowledge or readily available).: Yes The level of presentation is appropriate for readers of TPT.: Yes The quality of the writing (clarity of presentation) is acceptable.: Doubtful A thorough literature search has been done as eviden 这个是要改稿件格式适应栏目，还是改栏目。  发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有13人回复
-
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
-
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？
已经有3人回复
-
论文投稿，期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
-
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- 博学EPI: 68
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
linzhiqi1: 金币+200, ★★★★★最佳答案 2021-11-16 15:18:15
linzhiqi1: 金币+200, ★★★★★最佳答案 2021-11-16 15:18:15
|
Q: 是要改稿件格式适应栏目，还是改栏目 (?) A: 文章范围很大, 不适合在 TPT (The Physics Teacher) 杂志的 "Little Gems" 小课题专栏登; 高中老师大多不熟 Arduino, 但很适合大专教学 ---------- 大问题很多, 英文烂相对事小 (不修不行, 编辑连文章开头两句都看不懂) - 参考书目中的最新文章2002见刊, 之后发表的相关文章很多, 建议细读若干("至少其中某一"  新文章后重写- 编辑: "尽力详述如何在不同水位或不同流体环境用此教具" - 内审: "实验步骤描述不清, 没提怎么上传代码 |
2楼2021-11-14 00:02:28
163132314ya
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
研究型学者
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6578.7
- 散金: 423
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 1951
- 在线: 165.5小时
- 虫号: 4971448
- 注册: 2016-09-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2021-11-19 11:46:33