| 查看: 2424 | 回复: 16 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
文章revise是什么情况呀
|
|||
|
某一区top,一审主编说有两个审稿人,但是只发来了一个人的意见,给的是大修,但是只有几条意见,然后说了这句话After carefully reviewing these comments, I think your paper could be acceptable for publication after revision to address the concerns raised by the reviewers. 修回后,主编没有再送审,给了个revise说我引用该期刊文章数量太少会被认为和期刊关联度较低,You mentioned that you have conducted a comprehensive literature review to include more relevant literature in your paper. I am surprised to see that you have ignored the latest literature in the same subject published in XXX. Your paper only has ~10% references from XXX, indicating its less relevant to our journal. I can find several papers in the topic of XXX. Are they relevant? XXX values your contribution and I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript 其他也没有说啥了,我把他推荐的文章都引了又找了一些该期刊的其他文章,引用量大约30%左右,返回去一直with editor 10多天了,这种情况编辑还会找审稿人吗? |
» 猜你喜欢
系统里面怎么还是等待基金委接收纸质
已经有3人回复
同一个分子,一条来自文献,一条来自AI——不告诉你答案,你会选哪条?
已经有11人回复
烦躁
已经有3人回复
寻找合作团队
已经有4人回复
glu_jiaxin
禁虫 (正式写手)
★
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
8楼2021-10-16 16:51:07
4楼2021-10-16 15:57:16
7楼2021-10-16 16:26:28
11楼2021-10-16 17:16:19
简单回复
tzynew3楼
2021-10-16 15:54
回复
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
哦i 发自小木虫Android客户端
国际科学编辑5楼
2021-10-16 16:07
回复
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
qiaowzh10楼
2021-10-16 16:55
回复
MTXSCI19楼
2021-10-16 16:55
回复
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
, 发自小木虫Android客户端
bjdxyxy2楼
2021-10-16 15:51
回复
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
青青only6楼
2021-10-16 16:18
回复
chanx(金币+2): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端










回复此楼